(<.>U=343.11<.>)

Shepitko, M. .
    Counteraction to miscarriage of justice in Ukraine [Текст] / M. Shepitko // Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. - 2019. - Issue: 2. - P. 96-105
   Перевод заглавия: Противодействие судебной ошибки в Украине

УДК

343.1

343.11

ББК Х893.8
РУБ DOI: 10.33327/AJEE-18-2.3-a000015

Аннотация: Investigation of crimes against justice in Ukraine is among topical problems of miscarriage of justice. Hundreds of criminal cases are recorded as a crime in the Official Register in Ukraine but only a few have been brought to the court. In this article we try to approach this problem in three ways: from the point of view of criminal law, criminal procedure and criminalistic measures of counteraction to miscarriage of justice. Such an approach helps to demonstrate problems of investigator, prosecutor and judge at different stages of criminal proceeding. Special attention is paid to specific regulation of the issues of criminal proceedings against a certain category of persons, including judges. Mistakes of representatives of law enforcement bodies become visible as a result of analyzing of real criminal cases. Such an analysis is aimed to disclose the problem of counteraction to miscarriage of justice in Ukraine.

Текст - 0 байт

Ovcharenko, O. .
    Judge lustration in Ukraine: national insights and european implications [Текст] / O. Ovcharenko, T. Podorozhna // Access to justice in Eastern Europe. - 2020. - Issue: 4. - P. 226-245
   Перевод заглавия: Люстрация судьи в Украине: национальные идеи и европейские последствия

УДК

342.56

343.11

ББК Х629.01
РУБ DOI: 10.33327/AJEE-18-3.4-a000037

Аннотация: This article primarily focuses on the Ukrainian judge lustration, analysed from diverse aspects. Ukraine's legal lustration framework engenders two legal acts- the Law On Restoring Trust into Judicial Power in Ukraine (2014) and the law On Purification of Government (2014). Social feedback on adopting these Laws, their key objectives, provided instruments and efficiency issues are discussed. This research particularly scrutinises the fundamental European lustration standards, referencing a few European countries' experiences: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Poland. Deep insight into national lustration procedures is given, considering the European Court of Human Rights' relevant rulings and the Ukrainian Constitution's provisions. Remarks on whether all lustration laws comply with the Ukrainian Constitution are offered. Addressing the High Council of Justice's precedents, a judicial body entitled to verify the judges' lustration results, an in-depth empirical analysis of those procedural results are provided. Overall, Ukrainian lustration embodies a unique phenomenon due to strong social demand formalized in specially designed regulation.

Текст - 0 байт