(<.>K=JUDGMENTS$<.>)

Olkhovyі, O. .
    Experience of determining the priority of complex process or system (On the example of physical education and sport) [Текст] / O. Olkhovyі, A. Chernozub, S. Danylchenko, М. Korchagin, S. Romanchuk, A. Oderov, V. Klymovych, S. Zhembrovskyi // Journal of Physical Education and Sport. - 2020. - Vol. 20, Suppl. iss. 6. - Ст. 451. - P. 3330-3335. - Scopus. Вказана інша організація
   Перевод заглавия: Досвід визначення пріоритетності складного процесу чи системи (На прикладі фізичного виховання і спорту)

УДК

303.6:004

РУБ DOI: 10.7752/jpes.2020.s6451

Аннотация: The most used in today's methods of expert assessments (questionnaires, surveys, brainstorming) have a number of underestimations, the main of which is that the consistency and logic of expert statements are not determined. To solve this problem field, a computer program has been created for collecting, saving, quantitative comparison and operational processing of the results obtained through a collective expert evaluation. The article describes the mathematical algorithm of this program. As a base of the program, due to the combination of elements of the Delphi expert survey and the method of modern theory of hierarchical systems T. Saati, the procedure of synthesis of priorities is taken, which is calculated on the basis of subjective expert estimation. The priority or weighting factor is determined on the basis of the individual judgment pair comparison principle of the expert on the priority (the degree of advantage, weight) of one component of a particular process over another. In this work, the method of simple iteration is used. The created program establishes the judgments coherence and logic degree of each of the experts. That is, by way of the estimation pair comparison of the individual expert it is not permissible to violate the coherence and logic of his estimations. A dual comparison excludes the possibility of "blind" use of an uncoordinated and illogical evaluation, requires its refinement or ignores the use of such an assessment. With the help of convenient and easy to use author's computer program, scientists were able to quickly obtain quantitative units of weighting factors of the studied components of a particular process. This allows to display all the results of an interdependent collective, logical and coordinated individual expert estimation.

Текст - 0 байт
,
Scopus - 0 байт

Gusarov, K. .
    Finality of Judgments in Civil Cases and Related Considerations: The Experience of Ukraine and Lithuania [Текст] / K. Gusarov, V. Terekhov // Access to justice in Eastern Europe. - 2019. - Iss. 4. - P. 6-29

УДК

347.95

ББК Х629.217 + Х629.2
РУБ DOI: 10.33327/AJEE-18-2.4-a000020

Аннотация: Finality of judgments is a concept that puts an end to the trial, prohibiting subsequent appeals, opening of new proceedings and disputing clearly established facts. Despite being promoted by the Council of Europe and its Court of Human Rights and familiar to most if not all states, its application still encounters misunderstandings in some Eastern European Countries. Deeply rooted ideas of substantive truth and the public role of the judiciary, a rather idiosyncratic notion of fair trial and the rule of law all lead to underestimation of the role played by finality in a peaceful life of the society. This article addresses the experience of Ukraine (where a major judicial reform has just taken place) and Lithuania - two post-Soviet nations that both, still in their unique way, worked on implementing the principle of finality into their procedural order. The paper also explores an uneasy balance to be found between this notion and other relevant considerations (access to justice, rule of law, judicial economy and some other).

Текст - 0 байт

Kravtsov, S. .
    Ukraine-Romania judicial cooperation in civil matters: twenty years of signing the agreement [Електронний ресурс] / S. Kravtsov, O. Zinchenko, V. Panchenko // Juridical Tribune - Tribuna Juridica. - 2023. - Vol. 13, Iss. 2. - P. 171-191. - References : p. 189-191
   Перевод заглавия: Судове співробітництво України та Румунії у цивільних справах: двадцять років підписання угоди

УДК	347.91/.95(477+498)

РУБ DOI: 10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/2.02

Аннотация: The extraordinary session of the Verkhovna Rada of the Ukrainian SSR on August 24, 1991 proclaimed the independence of Ukraine and the creation of an independent Ukrainian state, the Act of Independence of Ukraine. Since then, Ukraine, as a sovereign, independent, independent State, has been creating legal relations between states, finding not only reliable partners, but also friends. One of these countries is Romania. This article examines the issue of the Agreement on Legal Assistance between Ukraine and Romania, which was signed in 2002, and implementing this act in the judicial system of Ukraine -through judicial cooperation, recognition of judicial decisions and participation of Romanian citizens in trials in Ukraine.

Текст - 0 байт
,
Текст - 0 байт
,
Web of Science Core Collection - 0 байт
,
Scopus - 0 байт
,
Зміст - 0 байт