Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого

⚖ Головна ⓘ Довiдка

Бази даних

Е-картотека "Публікації вчених НЮУ ім. Ярослава Мудрого в Scopus" - результати пошуку

Вид пошуку

Eлектронний каталог

Зведений електронний каталог «Правова освіта. Правова культура»

Е-картотека "Публікації вчених НЮУ ім. Ярослава Мудрого в Scopus"

Законодавство України 1917-1945

Власна база даних
Більше 728 000 документів: книги, статті, збірники наукових праць, рідкісні видання, дисертації, автореферати
Створюється з 1999 року
Легкий, зручний, багатоаспектний інформаційний пошук
Можливість цілодобово працювати з інформаційним контентом
Електронне замовлення книг дистанційно

Область поиска

Найдено в других БД:

Eлектронний каталог (8)

Зведений електронний каталог «Правова освіта. Правова культура» (1)

Формат представлення знайдених документів :
полный	информационный	краткий

Отсортировать найденные документы по:
автору	заглавию	году издания	типу документа

Пошуковий запит:

(<.>K=JUDGE'S$<.>)

Загальна кількість знайденихдокументів : 2
Показані документи с 1 по 2

1.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания : Х629.01/M88
Автор(ы) : Moskvych, Lidiya M., Khotynska-Nor, Oksana Z., Biletska, Ganna A.
Заглавие : Disease as interference for judge's profession
Место публикации : Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2019. - Vol. 72, Issue:12 cz 2. - P.2501-2509
ББК : Х629.01
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): dissimulation--judge--list of diseases--somatic illnesses--health status--medical expert commissions--mental disorders--притворство--судья--список заболеваний--соматические болезни--статус здоровья--медицинские экспертные комиссии--психические расстройства--вдавання--список захворювань--соматичні захворювання--статус здоров'я--медичні експертні комісії--психічні розлади
Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: Introduction: The judge's professional activity determines certain requirements for the health status of the person applying for this position or already performing his professional duties. Due to the specificity of professional activity, it could be cases of diseases that make it's impossible to perform professional functions effectively. It raises the question of the fairness of the dismissal procedure precisely for the health status that would exclude discrimination based on disability. The aim: The purpose of the scientific article is to summarize the leading experience of European countries on the protection and prevention of occupational illnesses of judges in order to substantiate specific proposals for the creation of an optimal procedure for dismissing a judge due to health status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The subject under discussion has been considered based on the relevant sources (scientific publications, legal acts, decisions of judicial and quasijudicial institutions), using the method of content analysis, comparative and contrastive, analytical and biblio-semantic methods. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: An analysis of European practice, including judgments on appealing against violations of the right to work due to unlawful dismissal based on health status allowed us to formulate key elements of a fair procedure for dismissing a judge due to illness, which makes it impossible to perform professional functions. A vision on the list of diseases that may be interference to effective judicial activity is developed by the authors. It is substantiated that such list of diseases should be a legal filter to judges employment and dismission. Regular medical examination and prevention of the development of occupational illnesses of a judge should become an integral part of the court's labor protection system. In the event of an accident related to performing professional functions, the judge is entitled to compensation.
Анотація - 0 байт

Анотація

,
Текст - 0 байт

Текст

, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие

2.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Kravtsov, Serhii, Sharenko, Svitlana, Krytska, Iryna, Kaplina, Vladyslava
Заглавие : The phenomenon of the judge's separate opinion European Court of Human Rights
Место публикации : Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. - 2024. - Vol. 7, iss. 4. - P.267-292. - ISSN 2663-0575. - ISSN 2663-0583
Примечания : DOI: https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-7.4-a000114
УДК : 341.645:341.231.14](4)
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): court decision--european court of human rights--human rights--judicial discretion--legal position--right to a fair trial--separate opinion of the judge--рішення суду--європейський суд з прав людини--права людини--суддівський розсуд--правове становище--право на справедливий суд--окрема думка судді
Аннотация: Background: The authors of the article refer to the institution of separate opinions of the judges of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the European Court, the Court or the ECtHR). They emphasise that this phenomenon has not been sufficiently studied in the legal literature. However, given the leading role of the European Court, its progressive views and authority – primarily on the European continent, where it serves as an umbrella for those who have not found protection at the national level – a judge’s opinion should not merely be an appendix to the Court’s decision. Instead, it should be regarded as the driving force for the development of the doctrine, warranting academic study, consideration by practitioners at the national level, and a possible reference point for forecasting and shaping future interpretations of the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights in ECtHR future decisions. Methods: In the article, the authors present the points of view of scientists and practitioners on the phenomenon of separate opinions, illustrating specific examples of what they consider to be the most interesting separate opinions attached to the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Based on substantive analysis, they formulate conclusions, emphasising the prospective doctrinal importance for world science, law-making and law-enforcement perspective for national legal systems, as well as unconditional axiological importance, because they play the role of a catalyst for creative judicial search, contribute to the support of judicial independence and personal responsibility. The special importance not only of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights but also of individual opinions, according to the authors, stems from the fact that those key problematic issues that bring citizens before the ECtHR are a priori difficult for the entire European community. The authors analysed separate opinions, such as that of ECtHR Judge Elósegui, which was expressed in the ECtHR case Mortier v. Belgium, regarding the ratio of the provisions of Article 2 "Right to Life" ECHR and euthanasia. The authors also focused on the key conclusions made by the Portuguese ECtHR Judge Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, who, in his nine-year tenure, independently or with colleagues, formulated more than 150 separate opinions. The authors particularly explore his opinions in two well-known cases, Bărbulescu v. Romania and Svetina v. Slovenia. Notably, in the former case, although the judge remained in the section in the minority, his separate opinion later turned into the opinion of the majority of the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR. Results and conclusions: The authors consider the phenomenon of a separate opinion of a judge of the European Court as a result of independent and deep thinking, an expression of the judge's individual legal awareness. This perspective is based on the author's immersion in the problems that were the subject of consideration by the panel of judges and found or, on the contrary, did not find their expression in the court decision. In examining separate opinions, the authors also pay attention to the specifics of their structural construction often employed by ECtHR judges. These skillfully structured opinions can serve as a valuable example for national courts, many of which are still in search of their individual legal style.
Текст - 0 байт

Текст

,
DOI - 0 байт

DOI

,
Scopus - 0 байт

Scopus

,
Web of Science - 0 байт

Web of Science

Найти похожие

Стандартний

Розширений

За словником

УДК-навігатор

За навчальною літературою

Статистика звернень

Умовні позначення місця знаходження

3_пов.(ЗПІ) – зала правової інформації, НБК

4_пов.(НАб) – абонемент наукової літератури, НБК

4_пов.(ДБФ) – довідково-бібліографічний фонд, НБК

5_пов.(З/П) – зала періодичних видань, НБК

6_пов.(АХЛ) – абонемент художньої літератури, НБК

6_пов.(ЗІЛ) – зала літератури іноземними мовами, НБК

7_пов.(Хр) – книгосховище, НБК

8_пов.(РК) – книгосховище рідкісних видань та дисертацій, НБК

НБВ – інформаційно-бібліографічний відділ, НБК, 7 поверх

Ст.Аб. – студентський абонемент, НБК, 5 поверх

Філ №1 – філія № 1 (вул. Динамівська, 4)

Філ №2 – філія № 2 (вул. Григорія Сковороди, 106)

Полт. фак. – Полтавський юридичний інститут, м. Полтава