(<.>K=DEBT$<.>)

Dmytryk, O. O.
    State legal forms of interaction with debt obligations and state losses [Text] / O. O. Dmytryk, Y. O. Kostenko, A. O. Monaienko, V. O. Riadinska, O. V. Soldatenko // Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. - 2020. - Vol. 11, Iss. 2. - p. 342-348. - [Припинена індексація в Scopus 18.01.2024]
   Перевод заглавия: Государственно-правовые формы взаимодействия с долговыми обязательствами и государственными убыткамиББК Х622
РУБ DOI: 10.14505/jarle.v11.2(48).07

Аннотация: Regulation of financial relations in the state is first and foremost based on an understanding of the allowed extent of freedom of financial transactions. In this regard, of relevance becomes the understanding of what is a limitation or expansion of the freedom of economic thought. The novelty of the study is determined by the fact that financial obligations ultimately become the tasks of state financial regulation. The authors demonstrate that the study should include the task of providing the state with a methodology and a toolkit for handling debt obligations within the state. The secondary objective is to build an understanding that legislation should also be aimed at reducing potential losses. Financial violations of a corruption nature are considered as objects of causing losses. The practical significance of the study lies in the fact that due to the reduction of problematic situations in the legislation, the socio-economic stability of the state as at large increases.

Анотація - 0 байт

Shcherbak, S. V..
    The role of technology in enhancing a recoverer-oriented approach to the enforcement process [Електронний ресурс] / S. V. Shcherbak, O. M. Ivanii, D. M. Sibilyov, R. H. Shchokin, L. V. Krupnova // Relacoes Internacionais no Mundo Atual. - 2023. - Vol. 3, no. 41. - P. 46-62. - References : p. 60-62
   Перевод заглавия: Роль технологій у поліпшенні підходу до процесу примусового виконання

УДК

347.952

РУБ DOI: 10.21902/Revrima.v3i41.6396

Аннотация: This research paper delves into the role of technology in promoting and enhancing a recoverer-oriented approach to the enforcement process. Recognizing the evolving nature of the enforcement process and the need to prioritize the rights of recoverers, this study explores how technological advancements can be leveraged to facilitate a more efficient and effective enforcement process. By adopting a recoverer-oriented approach, where the focus is on restoring the rights of recoverers rather than solely on the debtor, the enforcement process can align more closely with principles of justice and fairness. The research employs a multidimensional methodology, combining legal analysis, case studies, and comparative assessments of enforcement processes across different jurisdictions. Additionally, technological advancements such as automation, data analytics, and digital platforms are examined for their potential to streamline and optimize the enforcement process. The study also considers the impact of technology on enforcement procedural legislation and its role in harmonizing enforcement practices on a national and international level. Through the analysis of relevant literature and empirical data, this research provides insights into the benefits and challenges associated with integrating technology into the recoverer-oriented enforcement process. Furthermore, it investigates the potential impact of technology on the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of the enforcement process, with a specific focus on enhancing the enforceability of court decisions and decisions of other bodies.

Анотація - 0 байт
,
Текст - 0 байт
,
Scopus - 0 байт

Hrytsenko, H. H..
    Grounds for Occurrence of Civil Law Obligations Involving Plurality of Person [Електронний ресурс] / H. H. Hrytsenko // JUS Rivista di Scienze Giuridiche. - 2023. - Vol. 2023, Iss. 3. - P. 166-180
   Перевод заглавия: Підстави виникнення цивільно-правових зобов'язань за участю множинності осіб

УДК

347.41

РУБ DOI: 10.26350/18277942_000130

Аннотация: The study of civil law obligations involving a plurality of persons is relevant due to the existing research gap and the need for a comprehensive understanding of this legal phenomenon. The purpose of the study is to investigate and gain a comprehensive understanding of the grounds for the emergence of civil law obligations involving a plurality of persons. The study utilized scientific methods as such analysis, synthesis, comparison, analogy, deduction, induction, and abstraction. Methods such as structural-functional analysis, comparative law analysis, and formal law analysis were employed. The study yielded key results, including classification of obligations into partial and joint and several, study of creditor claims and debtor performance options, determination of general and special grounds for obligations involving multiple persons, highlighting the role of indivisibility, as well as recommendations for legislative regulation of severability of objects of civil rights. In conclusion, this scientific article provides valuable insights into civil law obligations involving a plurality of persons. The study categorizes these obligations into partial and joint and several obligations, delineating the rights and responsibilities of creditors and debtors. The study identifies both general and special grounds for such obligations, highlighting the importance of indivisibility as a key factor.

Текст - 0 байт
,
Текст - 0 байт
,
Scopus - 0 байт

Us, M. .
    Criminological Effectiveness of the Astrent as a Legal Incentive for Judgment Enforcement [Електронний ресурс] / M. Us, S. Glotov, Y. Nosik // Pakistan Journal of Criminology. - 2024. - Vol. 16, No. 1. - P. [1-16]. - References : p. 12-16. - DOI: https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.1.1.16
   Перевод заглавия: Кримінологічна ефективність астренту як правового стимулу для виконання судових рішень

УДК	343.9:347.952

Аннотация: The enforcement of judicial decisions is a pivotal aspect of the criminal justice system. The institution of an astrent is recognized as a legal mechanism designed to motivate a debtor to comply with a judicial decision, thereby serving as a deterrent to non-compliance and as a reinforcement of the rule of law. This coercive tool, by imposing negative material consequences, is intended to ensure adherence to a verdict, which is essential for maintaining public trust in the justice system – a core criminological concern. Given the varying legal nature of the astrent across different jurisdictions, this study examines its potential introduction into Ukrainian law from a criminological perspective, analyzing its deterrent capacity within the framework of criminal justice enforcement. The research outlines the similarities and distinctions between the astrent and other punitive measures, delving into its effectiveness as a defense method and its role in bolstering the execution of judgments. It highlights specific dispute categories within the criminal justice system where the astrent could significantly enhance compliance. Critical to the adaptation of this European legal construct to Ukrainian legislation, the paper scrutinizes several foundational issues that necessitate resolution. Notably, the paper discusses the termination of the right to an astrent post-imposition, suggesting that the objective impossibility of fulfilling a judicial act – owing to circumstances emerging after the court's decision and leading to the obligation's termination as per Article 607 of the Civil Code – should be the sole ground for relieving a debtor from the astrent payment. The study's alignment with criminological interests lies in its potential to shape debtor behavior, augment the effectiveness of legal sanctions, and provide empirical evidence for policy-making in the realm of crime management and enforcement legislation. The implications for both national and international criminological scholarship are considered, with the article contributing to the ongoing discourse on the optimization of punitive measures within the justice system and their theoretical underpinnings.

Текст - 0 байт
,
Scopus - 0 байт