(<.>K=A MENTALLY ILL PERSON$<.>)

Maryniv, V. I..
    The medical criterion of recognition of person's insanity defence: ukrainian and foreign experience [Текст] / V. I. Maryniv, M. O. Karpenko, O. I. Berezhnyi // Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2019. - Vol. 72, Iss. 12, cz. 2. - p. 2609-2614
   Перевод заглавия: Медицинский критерий признания защиты безумия человека: украинский и зарубежный опытББК Х629.341.3
РУБ DOI: 10.36740/WLek201912236

Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: Introduction: Problems of recognition of person's insanity defence occupy borderline between jurisprudence and medicine as they are based on a combination of medical and legal criteria. This makes them relevant in the context of medical law. The aim: of the article is to determine the medical criterion of recognition of person's insanity defence on the basis of international standards, Ukrainian and foreign experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Мaterials and methods: International documents, national legislation of Ukraine and foreign countries, theoretical works in the field of jurisprudence and psychiatry, empirical materials on the recognition of persons's insanity defence in Ukraine. CONCLUSION: Сonclusions: As a result of the research the universal medical criterion of insanity was formulated as "mental disorder defined by the International Statistical Trauma Classification, death resulting in a person being unable to understand and direct his or her actions", that may be implemented into the criminal legislation of any state.

Анотація - 0 байт
,
Текст - 0 байт

Borisova, V. I..
    Involuntary admission of a mentally ill person as restrictions of the right to liberty [Текст] / V. I. Borisova, Y. M. Zhornokui, L. V. Krasytska // Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2020. - Vol. 73, Iss. 12, cz. 2. - P. 2915-2920
   Перевод заглавия: Ненамеренное признание психически больным человека как ограничение права на свободу

УДК

347.155

РУБ PubMed ID33611303 + DOI: 10.36740/WLek202012235

Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: The aim: To determine the grounds of involuntary admission of a mentally ill person in the context of the possibility to restrict his or her right to liberty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The authors have studied and analyzed international legal acts, legislation of certain countries, judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, case law on involuntary admission of a mentally ill person by using philosophical, general and special scientific research methods. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The imperfection of the legal regulation of relations concerning the involuntary admission of a mentally ill person leads to illegal restriction of the personal right to liberty. It has been proven that involuntary admission and restriction of the freedom of a mentally ill person can be justified, if we take into account the requirement of "therapeutic necessity" for a mentally ill person, the requirement of protecting the rights of others and guaranteeing their safety, the requirement of ensuring the best interests of a mentally ill person.

Текст - 0 байт