Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого ⚖ Головна ⓘ Довiдка
Авторизацiя
Прiзвище (укр.)
N Читацького квитка
 

Базы данных


Е-картотека "Публікації вчених НЮУ ім. Ярослава Мудрого в Scopus" - результати пошуку

Вид пошуку

  • Власна база даних
  • Більше 728 000 документів: книги, статті, збірники наукових праць, рідкісні видання, дисертації, автореферати
  • Створюється з 1999 року
  • Легкий, зручний, багатоаспектний інформаційний пошук
  • Можливість цілодобово працювати з інформаційним контентом
  • Електронне замовлення книг дистанційно
Область поиска
в найденном
 Найдено в других БД:Eлектронний каталог (4)
Формат представлення знайдених документів :
полный информационныйкраткий
Отсортировать найденные документы по:
авторузаглавиюгоду изданиятипу документа
Пошуковий запит: 

(<.>T=ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN EASTERN EUROPE (ИСТ. СТ.)$<.>)

Загальна кількість знайденихдокументів : 32
Показані документи с 1 по 10
 1-10    11-20   21-30   31-32 
1.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Izarova, Iryna, Kravtsov, Serhij
Заглавие : About the special issue on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the European convention on human rights
Место публикации : Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. - 2021. - Vol. 4, Iss. 1. - P.5-7. - У WoS не зазначено: Vol. 4
УДК : 341.231.14
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): european convention on human rights--європейська конвенція з прав людини--европейская конвенция по правам человека
Аннотация: Анотація відсутня
Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
2.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Getman, Anatolii
Заглавие : Access to justice for the protection of environmental rights in Ukraine
Место публикации : Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. - 2021. - Vol. 4, Iss. 2. - P.118-127. - У WoS не зазначено: Vol. 4.
УДК : 342.72/.73:349.6](477)
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): environmental disputes--environmental human rights--environmental justice--екологічні права людини--екологічні спори--екологічна справедливість--экологические права--экологические споры--экологическая справедливость
Аннотация: The article deals with specific issues of access to justice relating to the protection of environmental rights. The harmonization and approximation of national legislation with international standards is an essential factor in the development of environmental rights. Particular attention is paid to public participation in the consideration of environmental protection by administrative authorities and in judicial proceedings.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст
Найти похожие
3.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Kaplina, Oksana, Sharenko, Svitlana
Заглавие : Access to justice in ukrainian criminal proceedings during the COVID-19 outbreak
Место публикации : Access to justice in eastern europe. - 2020. - Issue: 2-3. Special Issue: SI. - P.115-133
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): justice in the context of the covid-19 pandemic--правосудие в условиях пандемии covid-19--правосуддя в умовах пандемії covid-19--access to justice in the context of the covid-19 pandemic--доступ к правосудию в контексте пандемии covid-19--доступ до правосуддя в контексті пандемії covid-19--judicial control over the protection of rights--судебный контроль за защитой прав--судовий контроль за захистом прав--freedoms and legitimate interests of persons in criminal proceedings--свободы и законные интересы лиц в уголовном процессе--свободи і законні інтереси осіб в кримінальному процесі--the investigating judge--следственный судья--слідчий суддя--reasonable terms of criminal proceedings--разумные сроки уголовного производства --розумні терміни кримінального провадження--publicity and openness of court proceedings--гласность и гласность судебного разбирательства--гласність і гласність судового розгляду--trial by videoconference--испытание по видеоконференции--випробування по відеоконференції
Аннотация: This article examines relevant issues of criminal proceedings in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ukraine. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, many governments have focused their efforts on protecting democratic values and ensuring not only the rights and legitimate interests of their people, but also their lives and health. At the same time, the pandemic has affected not only the economies of countries, but also their democratic development and fundamental rights, which have always been a priority of any democratic society. Courts and law enforcement authorities have faced challenges that have been and still are adequately addressed in order to ensure that the rights and legitimate interests of those seeking judicial protection are respected. Each state independently assessed the degree of risks and the extent of permissible restrictions on the rights and freedoms of persons involved in the proceedings, so the present study analyses the different approaches that have been applied. At the same time, documents of the Council of Europe for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) have gained high importance, because they, among others, have developed tools for Council of Europe member states to address the problems of ensuring access to justice in the pandemic. The generalization and widespread discussion of such experiences is important, because it will be useful for states to further improve existing legislation, taking into account best practices. Based on a study of changes introduced in the Ukrainian legislation to prevent the spread of the coronavirus disease, conclusions are proposed about the nature and extent of the restrictions, as well as the principles on which they should be based and the guarantees to be provided. Recommendations that will contribute to improving the regulation of access to justice in criminal matters in a pandemic are also proposed.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
4.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Kroitor, Volodymyr, Mamnitskyi, Valeriy
Заглавие : Adversarial Principle Under the New Civil Procedure in Ukraine
Место публикации : Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. - 2019. - Iss. 4. - P.30-41
УДК : 347.91
ББК : Х629.2 + Х629.2-2
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): adversariality--состязательность--змагальність--equality of parties--равенство сторон--рівність сторін--principles of the civil procedure--принципы гражданского процесса--принципи цивільного процесу--competitiveness--конкурентоспособность --конкурентоспроможність--procedural activity of the court--процессуальная деятельность суда--процесуальна діяльність суду--principle of cooperation between the parties and the judge--принцип сотрудничества сторон и судьи--принцип співробітництва сторін і судді
Аннотация: This work deals with the evolution of adversarial princtple in civil process under the conditions of post-socialist regression and post-reform civil justice as well as the introduction of the principles of case management and cooperation between the court and the parties in the process. In particular, it analyses the main provisions of such new guarantees of realization of the right to a fair trial, which were introduced in the CPC of Ukraine in 2017-2018 as a court's right to prevent abuse of procedural rights, as well as the exchange of competitive documents between the parties. The authors argue that effective protection of the rights today is to be based on the adversarial principles that shall be supplemented by the security of the balance of rights of the parties and the authority of the court on the examination of civil matters.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
5.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Shepitko, Mykhaylo
Заглавие : Counteraction to miscarriage of justice in Ukraine
Место публикации : Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. - 2019. - Issue: 2. - P.96-105
УДК : 343.1 + 343.11
ББК : Х893.8
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): counteraction--противодействие--протидія--measures--меры--заходи--miscarriage of justice--судебная ошибка --судова помилка--influence of justice--влияние правосудия --вплив правосуддя--crime against justice--преступление против правосудия--злочин проти правосуддя--illegal verdict--незаконный приговор--незаконний вирок--judge--судья--суддя--fair trial--справедливое судебное разбирательство --справедливий судовий розгляд--court--суд
Аннотация: Investigation of crimes against justice in Ukraine is among topical problems of miscarriage of justice. Hundreds of criminal cases are recorded as a crime in the Official Register in Ukraine but only a few have been brought to the court. In this article we try to approach this problem in three ways: from the point of view of criminal law, criminal procedure and criminalistic measures of counteraction to miscarriage of justice. Such an approach helps to demonstrate problems of investigator, prosecutor and judge at different stages of criminal proceeding. Special attention is paid to specific regulation of the issues of criminal proceedings against a certain category of persons, including judges. Mistakes of representatives of law enforcement bodies become visible as a result of analyzing of real criminal cases. Such an analysis is aimed to disclose the problem of counteraction to miscarriage of justice in Ukraine.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст
Найти похожие
6.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Kabalskyi, Roman, Shevchyk, Olexandr
Заглавие : Does normativity contribute to the effective protection of rights? Reflections on the concept of normativity in the modern ukrainian doctrine of law
Место публикации : Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. - 2021. - Vol. 4, Iss. 2. - p.155-169
ББК : Х06
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): due diligence of law--effective mefsures of protection of law--human rights--law--normativity--ukraine--долговечное разбирательство законодательства--эффективные меры защиты законодательства--права человека--право--нормативность--украина--довготривалий розгляд законодавства--ефективні заходи захисту законодавства--права людини--нормативність--україна
Аннотация: Normativity is considered the basis for the implementation of social regulation. However, this regulation of social relations must be organised and have a positive impact on the development of society. Normativity is considered to be the primary, original property of social reality due to the natural demand for establishing order and its integral ability for self-organisation. The integration of elements into a balanced system is carried out through their coordinated interactions, resulting in something new, which has a unique integrative quality, provided that this quality was absent before their integration into the system. At the same time, nowadays, the phenomenon of normativity is studied mostly from traditional positions. A number of well-known works that raise the issue of normativity were written in the middle of the last century under conditions of an ideological monopoly and are unlikely to enrich the modern understanding of the normative nature of law. Today, in the Ukrainian scholarly literature, because of Soviet remnants, only the formal (positive-empirical) side of normativity is being assessed, which leads to it being replaced by the concept of state coercion. In general, this leads to the spread and dominance of extremely negative phenomena in Ukrainian society, among which the total non-enforcement of court decisions is worth mentioning. The solution to this problem cannot simply be improving coercive measures of the state alone – there must be changes to understanding the rule of law and, in particular, the nature of normativity. The analysis of the method of objectification (formation) of the due diligence of law will significantly contribute to targeting this problem because the latter is not solely derived from the dictates of the state (or the empirical phenomena). However, the key focus is finding the answer to one of the most important questions of jurisprudence and the philosophy of law, namely: ‘Why should a person obey the law?’. Thus, we are highly motivated to initiate a philosophical and legal rethinking of approaches to the normativity of law and the legitimation of state and legal processes. This article is an attempt to target a discussion in this sphere.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст
Найти похожие
7.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Kaplina, Oksana, Tumaniants, Anush
Заглавие : ECTHR decisions that influenced the criminal procedure of Ukraine
Место публикации : Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. - 2021. - Vol. 4, Iss. 1. - P.102-121. - У WoS не зазначено: Vol. 4
УДК : 343.1(477)(094.4)
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): european convention--европейская конвенция--європейська конвенція--human rights--права людини--права человека--criminal procedure--уголовный процесс--кримінальний процес--principles of criminal procedure--принципи кримінального процесу--принципы уголовного процесса--ukraine--украина--україна--freedom from self-disclosure--свобода от самораскрытия--свобода від саморозкриття--the right not to testify against close relatives and family members--право не свидетельствовать против близких родственников и членов семьи--право не давати свідчень проти близьких родичів та членів сім'ї--the right to defence--право на защиту--право на захист
Аннотация: As of 2020, 70 years have passed since the day of the adoption of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), which Ukraine ratified in September 1997. It was from this date that the countdown to significant democratic transformations in Ukraine and the establishment of human and civil rights and freedoms began. In this article, the authors raise relevant issues of reforming the criminal process of Ukraine in the context of European standards. The old Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine was adopted in 1960 and was in force for almost half a century. During this time, it became obsolete and bore a significant imprint of the Soviet past, which was manifest in both the bodies that conducted the trial and had primarily repressive powers and the public interests that dominated the rights and legitimate interests of those involved in criminal justice. The conditions under which the first steps aimed at realising the importance of the Convention and the value of human rights enshrined in it took place were not easy. The path of reform processes in criminal proceedings was associated with the confrontation of the Soviet past with modern transformation. It was difficult to realise the need to harmonise national legislation with European standards of human rights and freedoms and consolidate their perception as one of the necessary conditions for Ukraine's integration into the European legal space, as well as the need for a conceptually new worldview for both the people of Ukraine and law enforcement bodies - officers, judges, and prosecutors.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
8.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Shygal, Denys, Omarova, Aisel
Заглавие : Evaluation of the results of the historical and legal comparison of the juvenile justice of Ukraine and Poland in the 1920s
Место публикации : Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. - 2021. - Vol. 4 , Iss. 2. - P.67-85. - У WoS не зазначено: Vol. 4.
УДК : 340.15(477+438)
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): evaluation of results--forecasting--historical and legal comparison--interpretation--juvenile commissions--juvenile courts--juvenile justice--історико-правовий аналіз--історико-правове порівняння--неповнолітні--ювенальні суди--ювенальна юстиція--історія держави і права зарубіжних країн--історія держави і права україни--історія держави і права польщі--историко-правовая оценка--историко-правовой анализ--ювенальная юстиция--ювенальные суды--история государства и права
Аннотация: The methodology of comparative historical and legal research is extremely complex, as each stage puts forward a number of specific requirements for the qualification of a historian, as well as for the procedure for working with historical and legal material. However, despite the importance of comparative analysis, which consists of comparing historical and legal objects, the stage of interpreting and evaluating the results of comparative research remains the priority in the context of heuristic knowledge. However, there are still no clear algorithms by which the comparative historian can perform this task, nor is there a general understanding of the direction in which the data obtained during the historical-legal comparison should be explained. Particular difficulties arise in interpreting the results of the comparison of specific historical and legal objects such as the court and the judiciary. In this article, we try to overcome this discrepancy between the theory and practice of the comparative historical and legal method using the comparative analysis of juvenile justice in Ukraine and Poland in the 1920s, recreating the sequence of actions of a comparative historian, which lead to important scientific results. The structure of the article is determined by its main task and therefore begins with the coverage of theoretical and methodological principles of interpretation and evaluation of the results of comparative historical and legal analysis. In particular, this part deals with the main approaches to the explanation of the data obtained during the comparison of historical and legal objects, as well as the primary rules and principles of their interpretation. The next part of the article is devoted to a specific example comparing juvenile commissions of the Ukrainian SSR and juvenile courts and probation officers of Poland in the 1920s and further explanation of the information obtained. Finally, the last part of the article explores the possibilities and prospects of historical and legal forecasting at the stage of evaluating the results of a comparative study.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст
Найти похожие
9.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Gusarov, Kostyantin, Terekhov, Viktor
Заглавие : Finality of Judgments in Civil Cases and Related Considerations: The Experience of Ukraine and Lithuania
Место публикации : Access to justice in Eastern Europe. - 2019. - Iss. 4. - P.6-29
УДК : 347.95
ББК : Х629.217 + Х629.2
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): finality of judgments--окончательность судебных решений--остаточність судових рішень--legal effect--юридична сила--юридическая сила--юридический эффект--юридичний ефект--res judicata--разрешенное дело--вирішена справа--review of judicial decisions--пересмотр судебных решений--перегляд судових рішень--access to justice--доступ к правосудию--доступ до правосуддя--rule of law--верховенство закона--верховенство закону--correction of errors--исправление ошибок--виправлення помилок--judicial economy--судебная экономика--судова економіка
Аннотация: Finality of judgments is a concept that puts an end to the trial, prohibiting subsequent appeals, opening of new proceedings and disputing clearly established facts. Despite being promoted by the Council of Europe and its Court of Human Rights and familiar to most if not all states, its application still encounters misunderstandings in some Eastern European Countries. Deeply rooted ideas of substantive truth and the public role of the judiciary, a rather idiosyncratic notion of fair trial and the rule of law all lead to underestimation of the role played by finality in a peaceful life of the society. This article addresses the experience of Ukraine (where a major judicial reform has just taken place) and Lithuania - two post-Soviet nations that both, still in their unique way, worked on implementing the principle of finality into their procedural order. The paper also explores an uneasy balance to be found between this notion and other relevant considerations (access to justice, rule of law, judicial economy and some other).
Текст - 0 байт
Текст
Найти похожие
10.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Donets, Olga
Заглавие : Instituting principles for the reproduction (restoration) of natural resources and complexes in the context of ensuring and protecting fundamental human rights
Место публикации : Access to justice in eastern Europe. - 2021. - Vol. 4, Iss. 4. - P.82-89
УДК : 349.6
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): law principles--environmental law principles--principles of instituting the reproduction (restoration) of natural resources and complexes--principle of legal provision for the ecosystem approach to the reproduction (restoration) of natural resources and complexes--"net gain" principle--"environmental net gain" principle--принципи права--принципи екологічного права--принципи встановлення відтворення (відновлення) природних ресурсів і комплексів--принцип правового забезпечення екосистемного підходу до відтворення (відновлення) природних ресурсів і комплексів--принцип чистого прибутку--принцип екологічного чистого прибутку--принципы права--принципы экологического права--принципы учреждения воспроизводства (восстановления) природных ресурсов и комплексов--принцип правового обеспечения экосистемного подхода к воспроизводству (восстановлению) природных ресурсов и комплексов--принцип чистой прибыли--принцип экологической чистой выгоды
Аннотация: This article is devoted to the study of instituting principles for the reproduction (restoration) of natural resources and complexes in the context of ensuring and protecting fundamental human rights. The paper analyses these principles and proposes dividing them into four groups according to their functional purpose: system-forming, organisational, preventive, and that of economic direction. The principle of legal provision for the ecosystem approach to the reproduction (restoration) of natural resources and complexes and the 'net gain' principle are of particular interest in the system for the reproduction (restoration) of natural resources and complexes. These two principles should be considered the most important ones and be the basis for the following: organising and implementing measures for the reproduction (restoration) of natural resources and complexes; recovering and improving the quality of ecosystems; preventing and eliminating harmful economic impacts on the environment and human health; ensuring the sustainable functioning of ecosystems by indissolubly linking and balancing all environmental objects. It is established that instituting principles for the reproduction (restoration) of natural resources and complexes are universal regulations of positive law, generally influencing the formation of state environmental policy and law-making, as well as litigation in Ukraine that is concerns environmental law principles.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст
Найти похожие
 1-10    11-20   21-30   31-32 
 

Умовні позначення місця знаходження

3_пов.(ЗПІ) – зала правової інформації, НБК

4_пов.(НАб) – абонемент наукової літератури, НБК

4_пов.(ДБФ) – довідково-бібліографічний фонд, НБК

5_пов.(З/П) – зала періодичних видань, НБК

6_пов.(АХЛ) – абонемент художньої літератури, НБК

6_пов.(ЗІЛ) – зала літератури іноземними мовами, НБК

7_пов.(Хр) – книгосховище, НБК

8_пов.(РК) – книгосховище рідкісних видань та дисертацій, НБК

НБВ – інформаційно-бібліографічний відділ, НБК, 7 поверх

Ст.Аб. – студентський абонемент, НБК, 5 поверх

Філ №1 – філія № 1 (вул. Динамівська, 4)

Філ №2 – філія № 2 (вул. Пушкінська, 106)

Полт. фак. – Полтавський юридичний інститут, м. Полтава