Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого ⚖ Головна ⓘ Довiдка
Авторизацiя
Прiзвище (укр.)
N Читацького квитка
 

Базы данных


Е-картотека "Публікації вчених НЮУ ім. Ярослава Мудрого в Scopus" - результати пошуку

Вид пошуку

  • Власна база даних
  • Більше 728 000 документів: книги, статті, збірники наукових праць, рідкісні видання, дисертації, автореферати
  • Створюється з 1999 року
  • Легкий, зручний, багатоаспектний інформаційний пошук
  • Можливість цілодобово працювати з інформаційним контентом
  • Електронне замовлення книг дистанційно
Область поиска
 Найдено в других БД:Eлектронний каталог (10)Зведений електронний каталог «Правова освіта. Правова культура» (1)
Формат представлення знайдених документів :
полный информационныйкраткий
Отсортировать найденные документы по:
авторузаглавиюгоду изданиятипу документа
Пошуковий запит: 

(<.>K=REASONABLE$<.>)

Загальна кількість знайденихдокументів : 5
Показані документи с 1 по 5
1.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания : Х629.34/V28
Автор(ы) : Vapniarchuk V. V., Trofymenko V. M., Shylo, Olga, Maryniv, Volodimir
Заглавие : Standards of criminal procedure evidence
Место публикации : Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. - 2018. - Vol. 9, Iss. 7. - p.2462-2470
ББК : Х629.34
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): assessment of evidence--internal coviction--probability balance--probable assumption--reasonable suspicion--оценка доказательств--внутренняя ковикция--баланс вероятности--вероятное предположение--разумная подвижность
Аннотация: The strategy of integration development of Ukraine envisages, in particular, the implementation of international standards of justice in the legal system of Ukraine. The article explores the essence of such a legal category as ‘the standard of criminal procedural proof’. The rules of evidence in the Anglo-Saxon and continental legal systems in the context of this issue are analyzed, as well as domestic criminal procedural legislation on the peculiarities of assessment of evidence in various criminal proceedings and at various stages. Conclusions are made on the existence of objective evidence of standards in the Anglo-Saxon family of law (‘beyond reasonable doubt’ and ‘probability balance’) and the subjective standard of proof in the countries of the continental system of law (‘on the basis of internal conviction’). The opinion on the lawfulness and expediency of the allocation of certain objective standards of proof and in domestic criminal proceedings is expressed.
Анотація - 0 байт
Анотація, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
2.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Karnaukh, Bohdan
Заглавие : Standards of proof: a comparative overview from the ukrainian perspective
Место публикации : Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. - 2021. - Vol. 4, Iss. 2. - P.25-43. - У WoS не зазначено: Vol. 4.
УДК : 347.94
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): standard of proof--стандарт доказательства--стандарт доказу--intime conviction--интимное убеждение--інтимне переконання--proof beyond reasonable doubt--доказательство за разумными сомнениями--доказ за розумним сумнівом--preponderance of the evidence--предупреждение доказательств--попередження доказів--balance of probability--баланс вероятности--баланс імовірності--bayesian decision theory--байесовская теория принятия решений--баєсова теорія рішення
Аннотация: The article addresses the issue of standards of proof from a comparative perspective. The author sketches the conventional distinction between common law and civil law countries in this regard, as well as some approaches that query the validity of the rigid division. The main purpose of the article is to characterise the Ukrainian approach to the standards of proof against the background of comparative analysis. The author concludes that recent developments in Ukrainian law have paved the way for a distinction between criminal and civil standards of proof However, the doctrine is not yet elaborate enough to warrant a coherent application of the two different standards.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст
Найти похожие
3.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Kaplina, Oksana, Sharenko, Svitlana
Заглавие : Access to justice in ukrainian criminal proceedings during the COVID-19 outbreak
Место публикации : Access to justice in eastern europe. - 2020. - Issue: 2-3. Special Issue: SI. - P.115-133
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): justice in the context of the covid-19 pandemic--правосудие в условиях пандемии covid-19--правосуддя в умовах пандемії covid-19--access to justice in the context of the covid-19 pandemic--доступ к правосудию в контексте пандемии covid-19--доступ до правосуддя в контексті пандемії covid-19--judicial control over the protection of rights--судебный контроль за защитой прав--судовий контроль за захистом прав--freedoms and legitimate interests of persons in criminal proceedings--свободы и законные интересы лиц в уголовном процессе--свободи і законні інтереси осіб в кримінальному процесі--the investigating judge--следственный судья--слідчий суддя--reasonable terms of criminal proceedings--разумные сроки уголовного производства --розумні терміни кримінального провадження--publicity and openness of court proceedings--гласность и гласность судебного разбирательства--гласність і гласність судового розгляду--trial by videoconference--испытание по видеоконференции--випробування по відеоконференції
Аннотация: This article examines relevant issues of criminal proceedings in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ukraine. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, many governments have focused their efforts on protecting democratic values and ensuring not only the rights and legitimate interests of their people, but also their lives and health. At the same time, the pandemic has affected not only the economies of countries, but also their democratic development and fundamental rights, which have always been a priority of any democratic society. Courts and law enforcement authorities have faced challenges that have been and still are adequately addressed in order to ensure that the rights and legitimate interests of those seeking judicial protection are respected. Each state independently assessed the degree of risks and the extent of permissible restrictions on the rights and freedoms of persons involved in the proceedings, so the present study analyses the different approaches that have been applied. At the same time, documents of the Council of Europe for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) have gained high importance, because they, among others, have developed tools for Council of Europe member states to address the problems of ensuring access to justice in the pandemic. The generalization and widespread discussion of such experiences is important, because it will be useful for states to further improve existing legislation, taking into account best practices. Based on a study of changes introduced in the Ukrainian legislation to prevent the spread of the coronavirus disease, conclusions are proposed about the nature and extent of the restrictions, as well as the principles on which they should be based and the guarantees to be provided. Recommendations that will contribute to improving the regulation of access to justice in criminal matters in a pandemic are also proposed.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
4.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания : Х623/B78
Автор(ы) : Borysova, Valentyna I., Karnaukh, Bohdan Peterovich
Заглавие : Standard of proof in common law: Mathematical explication and probative value of statistical data
Параллельн. заглавия :Стандарт доказування в загальному праві: математичне обґрунтування і доказове значення статистичних даних
Место публикации : Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine. - 2021. - Vol. 28, Iss. 2. - p.171-180
ББК : Х623
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): balance of probabilities--bayesian decision theory--байесська теорія рішення--beyond reasonable doubt--naked statistics--standard of proof--баланс можливості--поза розумною сумнівкою--оголена статистика--стандарт доказывания--баланс возможности--байесськая теория решения--вне разумніх сомнений
Аннотация: As a result of recent amendments to the procedural legislation of Ukraine, one may observe a tendency in judicial practice to differentiate the standards of proof depending on the type of litigation. Thus, in commercial litigation the so-called standard of “probability of evidence” applies, while in criminal proceedings – “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard applies. The purpose of this study was to find the rational justification for the differentiation of the standards of proof applied in civil (commercial) and criminal cases and to explain how the same fact is considered proven for the purposes of civil lawsuit and not proven for the purposes of criminal charge. The study is based on the methodology of Bayesian decision theory. The paper demonstrated how the principles of Bayesian decision theory can be applied to judicial fact-finding. According to Bayesian theory, the standard of proof applied depends on the ratio of the false positive error disutility to false negative error disutility. Since both types of error have the same disutility in a civil litigation, the threshold value of conviction is 50+ percent. In a criminal case, on the other hand, the disutility of false positive error considerably exceeds the disutility of the false negative one, and therefore the threshold value of conviction shall be much higher, amounting to 90 percent. Bayesian decision theory is premised on probabilistic assessments. And since the concept of probability has many meanings, the results of the application of Bayesian theory to judicial fact-finding can be interpreted in a variety of ways. When dealing with statistical evidence, it is crucial to distinguish between subjective and objective probability. Statistics indicate objective probability, while the standard of proof refers to subjective probability. Yet, in some cases, especially when statistical data is the only available evidence, the subjective probability may be roughly equivalent to the objective probability. In such cases, statistics cannot be ignored.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст
Найти похожие
5.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Barankova, Victoria
Заглавие : Reasonableness of notarial acts as a component of ensuring standards of latin notaries: the experience of Ukraine
Место публикации : Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. - 2022. - Vol. 1, Iss. 13. - P.178-192; \b Той же журнал, в базі Scopus вказано інші дані. - 2021. - Vol. 5, Iss. 1. - P.178-192
УДК : 347.961
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): notary--нотаріус--нотариус--notarial activity--нотариальная деятельность--нотаріальна діяльність--notarial acts--нотаріальні дії--нотариальные действия--notarial actions--rules of notarial actions--правила совершения нотариальных действий--правила вчинення нотаріальних дій
Аннотация: Background: This article is devoted to the study of the rules of notarial acts, the observance of which ensures the reasonableness of notarial acts as exemplified by Ukraine as a state belonging to the countries with Latin notaries. At the same time, the standardisation of Latin notary standards in Ukrainian legislation is associated with certain problems that do not fully reveal the potential of the notary and its functions as a body of undisputed civil jurisdiction. In this regard, the purpose of the work is to determine the components of the procedural mechanism to ensure the reasonableness of notarial acts, identify those shortcomings in their standardisation that lead to litigation, and formulate proposals for further improvement of notarial law on this basis. Methods: In the present research, we used the following methods: logical, systemic, specific sociological, hermeneutic, and modelling. It is established that the reasonableness of notarial acts is ensured by compliance with the rules on submission of evidence documents, requests for evidence documents by a notary, the signing of notarial documents, sending documents for examination, the compliance of documents submitted for notarial acts with statutory requests, and clarifying the will of the persons concerned. Results and Conclusions: It is proved that a notarial act issued based on the actual circumstances established within the notarial case, confirmed by the relevant evidence provided by the notarial legislation, should be considered reasonable. The grounds for exercising the powers of a notary to demand documents are determined, and the need to differentiate the order of recovery depending on the subjects in which such information is requested is emphasised. The content of the notary’s powers to request documents is clarified, and the conditions under which the exercise of such powers should be considered the notary’s duty are determined. The necessity of extending the duties of a notary to establish the will and real intentions of the persons concerned to all notarial acts and, in this regard, the standardisation of such a duty as a general rule of notarial acts is substantiated. It is concluded that the distinction between documents for which the originals are subject to preservation in the notarial file and those that are photocopied then returned to interested persons should be made, taking into account the loss or preservation of their validity and legal significance after said notarial action. The author determines the grounds and conditions for sending a document for examination, which is a procedural action of a notary that can be made only at the initiative or consent of the person who submitted the document. The proposals on the tendencies of standardisation of the content of the requirements of the validity of notarial acts and the consequences of their violation are formulated. © 2022 V Barankova.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст
Найти похожие
 

Умовні позначення місця знаходження

3_пов.(ЗПІ) – зала правової інформації, НБК

4_пов.(НАб) – абонемент наукової літератури, НБК

4_пов.(ДБФ) – довідково-бібліографічний фонд, НБК

5_пов.(З/П) – зала періодичних видань, НБК

6_пов.(АХЛ) – абонемент художньої літератури, НБК

6_пов.(ЗІЛ) – зала літератури іноземними мовами, НБК

7_пов.(Хр) – книгосховище, НБК

8_пов.(РК) – книгосховище рідкісних видань та дисертацій, НБК

НБВ – інформаційно-бібліографічний відділ, НБК, 7 поверх

Ст.Аб. – студентський абонемент, НБК, 5 поверх

Філ №1 – філія № 1 (вул. Динамівська, 4)

Філ №2 – філія № 2 (вул. Пушкінська, 106)

Полт. фак. – Полтавський юридичний інститут, м. Полтава