Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого ⚖ Головна ⓘ Довiдка
Авторизацiя
Прiзвище (укр.)
N Читацького квитка
 

Базы данных


Е-картотека "Публікації вчених НЮУ ім. Ярослава Мудрого в Scopus" - результати пошуку

Вид пошуку

  • Власна база даних
  • Більше 728 000 документів: книги, статті, збірники наукових праць, рідкісні видання, дисертації, автореферати
  • Створюється з 1999 року
  • Легкий, зручний, багатоаспектний інформаційний пошук
  • Можливість цілодобово працювати з інформаційним контентом
  • Електронне замовлення книг дистанційно
Область поиска
 Найдено в других БД:Eлектронний каталог (79)Зведений електронний каталог «Правова освіта. Правова культура» (8)
Формат представлення знайдених документів :
полный информационныйкраткий
Отсортировать найденные документы по:
авторузаглавиюгоду изданиятипу документа
Пошуковий запит: 

(<.>K=ХАЛАТНОСТЬ$<.>)

Загальна кількість знайденихдокументів : 3
Показані документи с 1 по 3
1.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Kaplina, Oksana V., Sharenko, Svitlana L., Shumylo, Nikolay Y.
Заглавие : Medical errors: patients' opinion, lawyers' standpoint, medical doctrine and practice of the european court of human rights
Место публикации : Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2019. - Vol. 72, Issue:12 cz 2. - P.2416-2420
УДК : 61
ББК : Х623.211.84
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): patient rights--права пациента--права пацієнта--practice of the european court of human rights (echr)--практика европейского суда по правам человека--практика європейського суду з прав людини--medical error--медицинская ошибка--медична помилка--medical negligence--медицинская халатность--медична недбалість--the positive obligations of the state in the field of health care--позитивные обязательства государства в сфере здравоохранения--позитивні зобов'язання держави в сфері охорони здоров'я
Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: Introduction: The problem of medical errors is always relevant in medical literature and law. Meanwhile, it is understood diametrically opposite by doctors, patients, and lawyers. This has a negative impact on patients' trust in medical professionals, and sometimes leads to criminal prosecution for a so-called "medical error", which in fact is conscientious deception, not a crime, and should exclude criminal liability. The aim: The aim of this work is the illustration of diametrically opposed approaches to understanding the essence of the concept of "medical error" from patients', doctors', and lawyers' views that are often generated by subjective approaches and results in distrust between doctors and patients, medical professionals and lawyers. The aim of the article is also to realize the ECHR's approach to understanding the essence of a medical error and distinguishing it from the negligence that should lead to liability of the medical professionals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: In this research a legal doctrine, scientific works, provisions of international legal acts, in particular, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms were used, as well as the practice of the ECHR (12 relevant ECHR decisions), where the Court considered cases related to "medical errors" and formulated positive obligations of the state in the field of health care were analyzed. A complex set of general and special methods of cognition was used to achieve the aim, they are comparative legal method, systemic and structural method, methods of generalization, analysis and synthesis, sociological method, hermeneutical method, etc. RESULTS: Results: A survey of patients, medical professionals and lawyers conducted by the authors (300 persons), analysis of doctrinal approaches are illustrated the gap between the doctrinal approaches existing in the understanding of the essence of the "medical error" phenomenon and the perceptions of the medical services recipients, which indicates the need of understanding the essence of the phenomenon of medical error in order to increase the confidence in the medical profession, the inadmissibility of doctors liability for a medical error. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The research gave the authors a reason to conclude that both medical and legal sciences are still far from the unity of views on the concept of "medical error". Medical errors significantly affect the authority of a medical institution, a particular doctor, or the state as a whole, and have severe consequences for patients. An analysis of the medical literature and ECHR practices has led to the conclusion that a medical error occurs when it is possible to completely exclude the guilt of medical professionals in the form of intent or negligence. In case of a medical error the criminal liability of the doctor is excluded.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
2.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания : 343.625/G97
Автор(ы) : Gutorova, Nataliya, Zhytnyi, Oleksandr, Kahanovska T.
Заглавие : Medical negligence subject to criminal law
Место публикации : Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2019. - Vol. 72, Issue:11, cz 1. - P.2161-2166
УДК : 343.625
ББК : Х623.211.84
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): medical mistake--медицинская ошибка--медична помилка--medical negligence--медицинская халатность--медична недбалість--criminal punishment--уголовное наказание--кримінальне покарання--legal liability--юридическая ответственность--юридична відповідальність--patient rights--права пациента--права пацієнта
Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: Introduction: Legal liability for medical negligence should contribute to the protection of patients' rights to life and health. At the same time, unreasonably strict sanctions against physicians should be analyzed much closely. More balanced model of such liability requires serious in-depth research. The aim of the article is to stimulate discussion about the necessity to improve the criminal legislation and judicial practice of criminal liability execution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: This study is based on the analysis of international law, WHO documents, jurdicial practice and statistics, criminal and medical law legal doctrine (29 laws and papers, 97 court judgments were analyzed). Dialectical, comparative, analytic, synthetic and system analysis research methods were used, also for interpretation purposes. CONCLUSION: An effective legal mechanism should ensure the timeliness and thoroughness of the investigation and prosecution of each case of medical negligence to prevent the recurrence of such consequences in the future. Legal liability (civil, disciplinary or criminal) for medical negligence is a necessary part of this mechanism. The inevitability of criminal punishment rather than its severity should be recognized as a core for the medical negligence prevention concept. That's why the long-term imprisonment for medical negligence as a form of punishment should be recognized as socially unreasonable, it cannot improve the protection of patients' life and health but leads to significant negative social complications instead.
Анотація - 0 байт
Анотація,
Текст - 0 байт
Текст
Найти похожие
3.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания : 614/G65
Автор(ы) : Gornostay, Alesia, Ivantsova, Alona, Mykhailichenko, Tetiana
Заглавие : Medical error and liability for it in some post-soviet countries (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Ukraine)
Место публикации : Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2019. - Vol. 72, Issue:5 cz 1. - P.877-882
УДК : 614 + 342.746
ББК : Х623.211.84
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): безнаказанность--медицинское преступление--уголовная ответственность--медицинская халатность
Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: Introduction: Infliction of harm to life and health due to medical errors is common for the whole world and post-Soviet countries, in particular. The problem of these errors is one of the most important in medical law, although there is no unified concept of it. A small number of sentences in cases of criminal negligence of medical professionals indicates a high latency and often unprovability of this crime in a number of post-Soviet countries. The aim: To disclose the objective and subjective prerequisites of a medical error, reasons for its occurrence, to establish the grounds for criminal liability of medical professionals in case they commit an error and to examine the judicial practice in this regard. Also, to define the concept and types of circumstances exempting criminal liability and their impact on criminal liability issues concerning medical professionals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The study is based on the Belarusian, Kazakh, Moldavian and Ukrainian statutory acts as well as international acts, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), national court judgments. Such methods as dialectical, comparative, analytic, synthetic and comprehensive have been used in the paper. RESULTS: Review: On the basis of the study, it has been established that there is no unified concept of a medical error, medical personnel are fairly brought to criminal liability only if they commit an unjustifiable error in the presence of all the mandatory elements of a crime provided for in the relevant article of the Criminal Code. At the same time, it is extremely difficult to prove existence of such an error. Besides, at the state levels, causes and mechanisms of occurring errors have not been revealed, they are not even discussed, which makes it impossible to outline measures to prevent them or reduce their frequency and degree of danger. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The struggle against medical errors should encompass a number of such activities as standardization of clinical treatment protocols, further education of medical professionals and lawyers in regard to patient safety, thorough investigation of each incident in order to exclude a justifiable error or circumstances exempting criminal liability. Equitable, severe and uncompromising punishments for perpetrators should be an effective means preventing commission of crimes in medicine.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
 

Умовні позначення місця знаходження

3_пов.(ЗПІ) – зала правової інформації, НБК

4_пов.(НАб) – абонемент наукової літератури, НБК

4_пов.(ДБФ) – довідково-бібліографічний фонд, НБК

5_пов.(З/П) – зала періодичних видань, НБК

6_пов.(АХЛ) – абонемент художньої літератури, НБК

6_пов.(ЗІЛ) – зала літератури іноземними мовами, НБК

7_пов.(Хр) – книгосховище, НБК

8_пов.(РК) – книгосховище рідкісних видань та дисертацій, НБК

НБВ – інформаційно-бібліографічний відділ, НБК, 7 поверх

Ст.Аб. – студентський абонемент, НБК, 5 поверх

Філ №1 – філія № 1 (вул. Динамівська, 4)

Філ №2 – філія № 2 (вул. Пушкінська, 106)

Полт. фак. – Полтавський юридичний інститут, м. Полтава