Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого ⚖ Головна ⓘ Довiдка
Авторизацiя
Прiзвище (укр.)
N Читацького квитка
 

Базы данных


Е-картотека "Публікації вчених НЮУ ім. Ярослава Мудрого в Scopus" - результати пошуку

Вид пошуку

  • Власна база даних
  • Більше 728 000 документів: книги, статті, збірники наукових праць, рідкісні видання, дисертації, автореферати
  • Створюється з 1999 року
  • Легкий, зручний, багатоаспектний інформаційний пошук
  • Можливість цілодобово працювати з інформаційним контентом
  • Електронне замовлення книг дистанційно
Область поиска
Формат представлення знайдених документів :
полный информационныйкраткий
Отсортировать найденные документы по:
авторузаглавиюгоду изданиятипу документа
Пошуковий запит: 

(<.>A=IEMELIANENKO, VOLODYMYR V.$<.>)

Загальна кількість знайденихдокументів : 3
Показані документи с 1 по 3
1.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания : Х623.211.84/H99
Автор(ы) : Iemelianenko, Volodymyr V., Gornostay, Alesia V., Ivantsova, Alona V.
Заглавие : Reproductive rights violations: forced sterilization and restriction of voluntary sterilization
Место публикации : Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2019. - Vol. 72, Iss. 12, cz. 2. - p.2536-2540
ББК : Х623.211.84
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): forced sterilization--reproductive rights--reproductive rights violations--voluntary sterilization--уничтоженная стерилизация--репродуктивные права--нарушение репродуктивных прав--добровольная стерилизация--знищення стерилізації--репродуктивні права--порушення репродуктивних прав--добровільна стерилізація
Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: Introduction: realization of reproductive rights is a relevant medical, social and legal problem in modern society. It is due to unfavorable demographic situation in almost all European countries, overcrowding problems in Asian countries, religious and moral oppression against persons, who do not wish to realize their right to reproduction. The aim: To define problems related to the protection of the right to reproduction and to develop propositions to improve the prevention and fight against forced sterilization and restrictions on voluntary sterilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The research is based on theoretical basis, which includes scientific articles, legislation reviews, reports of non-governmental organizations, as well as empirical basis - 3 judgements of the ECHR, international legal acts and directives, based on the analytical data of the World Health Organization. Systematic, structural, functional and legal comparative methods, as well as systematization, analysis and synthesis, were crucial in the research process. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Nowadays, it is possible to distinguish such types of sterilization in the world as voluntary and forced ones. Forced deprivation of the right to reproduction is a serious criminal offense that still takes place in modern society. Violations in the form of restricting voluntary sterilization have more latent nature and are not sufficiently regulated by legislation. Forced sterilization requires greater effectiveness in combating both at the national, and at the international level. Voluntary sterilization, as a method of contraception, requires clear regulation at the legislative level and the development of uniform principles and standards, both in national and in international law, in order to preclude restrictions in freely disposing reproduction function
Текст - 0 байт
Текст,
сервер - 0 байт
сервер
Найти похожие
2.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания : PubMed ID33611301/C67
Автор(ы) : Iemelianenko, Volodymyr V., Gornostay, Alesia, Maslak, Nataliya
Заглавие : Coerced sterilization as a reproductive rights violation
Место публикации : Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2020. - Vol. 73, Iss. 12, cz. 2. - P.2902-2908
УДК : 343.126.1
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): coerced sterilization of convicts--принудительная стерилизация осужденных--примусова стерилізація засуджених--coerced sterilization of transgender people --примусова стерилізація трансгендерних людей--примусова стерилізація трансгендерних людей--coerced surgical sterilization--примусова хірургічна стерилізація--принудительная хирургическая стерилизация--reproductive rights--репродуктивные права--репродуктивні права
Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: The aim: To outline and systematize the issues related to violations and restrictions on the realization of the right to reproduction. To develop propositions and recommendations on improving the prevention and combating various manifestations of coerced sterilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: Theoretical basis for studying this issue includes scientific publications, research of the legislative systems of different countries, the conclusions of international non-governmental organizations. The authors of the paper have also taken into account international regulations, including UN Conventions and Directives, decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), as well as analytical data provided by international organizations. Determinants in the study of this problem are the analysis, synthesis and generalization of the experience and legislative base of foreign countries, which are closely related to formal and comparative methods. Systematic, structural, dialectical and statistical methods have been also used in this paper to substantiate the problem of sterilization. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The most radical decision to refuse from reproduction is surgical sterilization (defertilization). It can be classified as voluntary, forced and coerced. The problems of preventing and combating coerced sterilization are among the most difficult ones. Bribery and mental coercion of persons in order to obtain consent for sterilization are either not regulated by law and do not entail any liability, including criminal, or even are part of the state government policy to regulate the number of citizens in overpopulated countries, HIV-infected people, including prisoners or transgender people.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст
Найти похожие
3.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания : 343.543/H99
Автор(ы) : Iemelianenko, Volodymyr V., Gornostay, Alesia V., Yevdokimova, Olena V.
Заглавие : Deprivation of reproductive right of sex offenders: social opinion and legislative regulation
Место публикации : Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2021. - Vol. 74, Iss. 11, cz. 2. - P.2928-2933
УДК : 343.543
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): deprivation of reproductive right--forced and voluntary sterilization of criminals--general and special prevention of sexual crimes’ commission--non-consensual--right to reproduction--sex offenders--позбавлення репродуктивного права--примусова та добровільна стерилізація злочинців--загальне та спеціальне запобігання вчиненню сексуальних злочинів--без згоди--право на відтворення--сексуальні злочинці--лишение репродуктивного права--принудительная и добровольная стерилизация преступников--общая и специальная профилактика совершения половых преступлений--без согласия--право на воспроизведение--сексуальные преступники
Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: The aim: The purpose of this article is to illustrate the social demand for the need to discriminate against perpetrators of sexual crimes by depriving them of reproductive rights. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The authors of the research used the legislation of various world countries, scientific papers, caselaw, the provisions of international legal acts, in particular, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The authors of the research used a complex set of general and special methods of cognition such as dialectical, comparative, analytical, generalization method, statistical and sociological method (questionnaire method). RESULTS: Results: The survey conducted by the authors highlights the attitude of physicians and law enforcement officials (100 people) to the sterilization of criminals as a measure necessary to prevent the commission of sexual crimes both by such persons and by others who are prone to committing such crimes but will refrain from their commission due to the fear of sterilization. The questionnaire shows the gap between awareness and recognition of natural human rights such as the right to reproduce and the desire to deprive a certain deviant category of people of this right for their safety. CONCLUSION: Conclusion: Based on the conducted analysis, the authors have formulated that there is currently a great social demand for radical measures to prevent the commission of sexual crimes by sterilizing those who committed such crimes. At the same time, the legislation of some countries also embodies such a desire of society in the relevant norms and provides the use of sterilization of criminals for special and general prevention of crimes against sexual freedom and inviolability. The research also demonstrates the erroneousness of this approach and proves the inadmissibility and medical inexpediency of depriving perpetrators of sexual crimes of their reproductive rights.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст
Найти похожие
 

Умовні позначення місця знаходження

3_пов.(ЗПІ) – зала правової інформації, НБК

4_пов.(НАб) – абонемент наукової літератури, НБК

4_пов.(ДБФ) – довідково-бібліографічний фонд, НБК

5_пов.(З/П) – зала періодичних видань, НБК

6_пов.(АХЛ) – абонемент художньої літератури, НБК

6_пов.(ЗІЛ) – зала літератури іноземними мовами, НБК

7_пов.(Хр) – книгосховище, НБК

8_пов.(РК) – книгосховище рідкісних видань та дисертацій, НБК

НБВ – інформаційно-бібліографічний відділ, НБК, 7 поверх

Ст.Аб. – студентський абонемент, НБК, 5 поверх

Філ №1 – філія № 1 (вул. Динамівська, 4)

Філ №2 – філія № 2 (вул. Пушкінська, 106)

Полт. фак. – Полтавський юридичний інститут, м. Полтава