Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого ⚖ Головна ⓘ Довiдка
Авторизацiя
Прiзвище (укр.)
N Читацького квитка
 

Базы данных


Е-картотека "Публікації вчених НЮУ ім. Ярослава Мудрого в Scopus" - результати пошуку

Вид пошуку

  • Власна база даних
  • Більше 728 000 документів: книги, статті, збірники наукових праць, рідкісні видання, дисертації, автореферати
  • Створюється з 1999 року
  • Легкий, зручний, багатоаспектний інформаційний пошук
  • Можливість цілодобово працювати з інформаційним контентом
  • Електронне замовлення книг дистанційно
Область поиска
 Найдено в других БД:Eлектронний каталог (100)Зведений електронний каталог «Правова освіта. Правова культура» (7)
Формат представлення знайдених документів :
полный информационныйкраткий
Отсортировать найденные документы по:
авторузаглавиюгоду изданиятипу документа
Пошуковий запит: 

(<.>A=ТІТКО$<.>)

Загальна кількість знайденихдокументів : 8
Показані документи с 1 по 8
1.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания : 343.1(477)(094.4)/K20
Автор(ы) : Kaplina, Oksana V., Shylo, Olha H, Titko, Ivan A
Заглавие : Using the samples of human biological materials in the criminal procedure: the practice of the european court of human rights
Место публикации : Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2019. - Vol. 72: Issue: 8 . - P.1576-1581
УДК : 343.1(477)(094.4)
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): human biological materials--биологические материалы человека--біологічні матеріали людини--taking of biological samples--взятие биологических образцов--взяття біологічних зразків--criminal procedure--уголовный процесс--кримінальний процес--practice of the european court of human rights--практика европейского суда по правам человека--практика європейського суду з прав людини--human rights--права людини--права человека--investigation of crimes--расследование преступлений--розслідування злочинів
Аннотация: Introduction: The use of modern advances in medicine to investigate crimes has caused a number of problems that require scientific reflection. In particular, today there are quite acute questions: medical intervention without the persons consent; forced sampling of human biological materials; clinical methods, the use of which in the biological samples taking will not be regarded as violation of international standards of human rights protection; the correlation of the need for the formation of DNA profile databases and the right of the person to non-disclosure of medical information. The aim: The aim of this work is to identify and analyze the key points of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the ECHR) regarding the peculiarities of retention and use of human biological material samples in the investigation of crimes, and the retention of such materials after the completion of the investigation and trial. Material and methods: In the preparation of the article, scientific works, the provisions of international normative acts regulating the use of human biological materials as well as the practice of the ECHR concerning the use of human biological materials in the investigation of crimes were used (8 decisions were analyzed in which the ECHR concerned the use of biological samples or related issues). In the research process to achieve the goal, a complex of general scientific and special methods of cognition was used, in particular, the comparative legal method, the system and structural method, the method of generalization, the method of analysis and synthesis, etc. Review: The positions of the ECHR concerning the following were distinguished and generalized: a) the criteria for the permissibility of compulsory medical intervention for taking of human biological material within the framework of the crime investigation; b) the possibilities of spreading the right not to incriminate oneself on the compulsory taking of human biological materials samples; c) the retention features of cell samples and DNA information in the context of respect for the right to non-interference in the persons private life. Conclusions: Obtaining and using the human material for the investigation of crimes are not a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter - the Convention), subject to the requirements stated in the practice of the ECHR. Keywords
Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
2.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания : PubMed ID33611275/M55
Автор(ы) : Tatsiy, Vasyl Y., Tyshchenko, Olga I. , Titko, Ivan A.
Заглавие : Mental health of a person as a criterion of personal participation in the trial during criminal proceedings
Место публикации : Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2020. - Vol. 73, Iss.12, cz. 2. - P.2737-2742
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): echr practice--expert opinion--мнение эксперта--висновок експерта--расстройство психики--психічний розлад--расстройство психики--mental health--душевное здоровье--психічне здоров'я--right to a fair trial--право на справедливий судовий розгляд--право на справедливое судебное разбирательство
Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to identify and analyze the key positions of the ECHR in the context of respect for the right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter - the Convention)) of a person suffering from mental disorders in criminal proceedings concerning the application of compulsory medical measures (hereinafter referred to as CMM); formulation of scientifically substantiated proposals for determining the restriction legality criteria of the right of a person suffering from a mental disorder to personal participation in the trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: During the preparation of the article, the following was processed: scientific research on ensuring the rights of persons suffering from mental disorders in criminal proceedings; provisions of international agreements on the provision of psychiatric care; the legal position of the ECHR on the observance of the right to a fair trial of persons suffering from mental disorders (6 decisions were analyzed in which the ECHR addressed these issues in the context of the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention); criminal procedural legislation of individual states; the results of a survey conducted by the authors of 88 judges (judges of local courts of Ukraine) on key issues of ensuring the participation of a person suffering from a mental disorder in a court hearing. In the process of research a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition was used (comparative-legal method, systemic-structural method, generalization method, method of analysis and synthesis, method of sociological research, method of expert assessments, etc.). RESULTS: Results: According to the results of the research: a) the legal positions of the ECHR to ensure the right of a person suffering from a mental disorder to a fair trial are identified and generalized (Article 6 of the Convention); b) criteria for the legality of restricting the right of a person suffering from a mental disorder to personal participation in the trial are proposed. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: An analysis of the ECHR's key positions led to the conclusion that there was a violation of a person's right to a fair trial in national case law (Article 6 of theConvention), due in part to the lack of clear criteria for legally restricting a person's right to a trial.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
3.

Вид документа : Однотомное издание
Шифр издания : Х629.382/T99
Автор(ы) : Tyshchenko, Olga I. , Leiba, Olena A., Titko, Ivan A.
Заглавие : European standards of respect for human rights in the application of compulsory medical measures in criminal proceedings
Место публикации : Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2019. - Vol. 72, Iss. 12. - p.2445-2450
ББК : Х629.382
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): echr practice--compulsory medical measures--criminal proceedings--psychiatric care--psychiatric examination--екпч практика--обязательные медицинские меры--уголовное судопроизводство--психиатрический уход--психиатрическая экспертиза--обов'язкові медичні заходи--кримінальне провадження--психіатричний догляд--психіатрична експертиза
Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: Introduction: The article is devoted to the research of topical issues of ensuring the rights of persons suffering from mental disorders and who are subject to criminal proceedings on the application of compulsory medical measures (hereinafter - CMM). The research was conducted in the context of international standards and interpretative practice of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the ECHR or the Court). The aim: The aim of this study is to analyze international acts concerning the protection of the rights of mentally ill persons when applying compulsory medical measures; to highlight and analyze the ECHR's key positions in the context of respect for the right to liberty and security of person (Article 5 1 (e) of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the Convention)) and the right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the Convention) in criminal proceedings concerning the use of CMM; to analyse the law enforcement practice and activities of psychiatrist experts on compliance with European standards for the protection of the rights of persons with mental disorders who are subject to criminal proceedings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: rescent scientific researches; provisions of international legal acts in the field of psychiatric care; the legal standpoint of the ECHR in respecting the rights of persons with mental disorders (15 decisions were analyzed in which the ECHR addressed these issues in the context of the requirements of Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention); criminal procedural legislation of foreign states (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russian Federation, Estonia, Uzbekistan, Germany); the results of the survey of 20 psychiatrists and experts conducted by the authors were used in this article To achieve this aim of research process a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition, including comparative and legal method, system and structural method, method of generalization, method of analysis and synthesis, method of sociological research, method of expert evaluation, etc. bein used. RESULTS: Results: summarized and generalized ECHR's standpoints concerning: a) minimum conditions without which a person cannot be considered as "mentally ill" and imprisoned; b) the aspects taken into account by the ECHR within each minimum condition in the context of ensuring the right to liberty and security of person (Article 5 1 (e) of the Convention); c) the peculiarities of the personal participation of an individual with a mental disorder in the judicial review of the application of CMM in terms of observing its right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the Convention). The degree of extrapolation of these standpoints to the activity of psychiatrists was identified and analyzed. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: the current practice of applying CMM in criminal proceedings does not fully comply with the international standards and legal positions of the ECHR in terms of providing a person with a mental disorder the right to liberty and security of person and the right to a fair trial (in particular, the minimum conditions without which a person cannot be considered as "mentally ill" and be imprisoned are not always met).
Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
4.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Tyshchenko, Olga I. , Titko, Ivan A.
Заглавие : Features of application of precautionary measures for persons suffering from mental disorders: National dimension
Параллельн. заглавия :Особливості застосування запобіжних заходів щодо осіб, які страждають на психічні розлади: національний вимір
Место публикации : Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine. - 2020. - Vol. 27, Iss. 1. - P.147-161
УДК : 343.13
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): кримінальний процес--уголовный процесс--принудительная медицинская помощь--психиатрическая помощь--примусові заходи медичного характеру--принудительные меры медицинского характера--compulsory psychiatric care--criminal proceedings--echr practice
Аннотация: The paper investigates topical issues of application of precautionary measures against persons subject to criminal proceedings for the application of compulsory psychiatric care in the context of international standards and interpretative practice of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The purpose of this paper is to identify and analyse the specific features of applying precautionary measures to a person suffering from a mental disorder based on the materials of generalization of domestic law enforcement practice in criminal proceedings regarding the application of compulsory psychiatric care. Research methods are selected with consideration of the purpose, objectives, and subject of research. General scientific and special methods of scientific cognition (dialectical, statistical, comparative law, analysis, synthesis, generalization) were used in the work. The integrated use of these methods has contributed to an objective and comprehensive scientific study. Based on the analysis of the current legislation and judicial practice, the specific features of application of preventive measures in criminal proceedings regarding compulsory psychiatric care are singled out, namely: a) they are applied to a person suffering from a mental disorder; b) are selected only in criminal proceedings concerning the application of compulsory psychiatric care; c) have a specific purpose conditioned by the presence of a mental disorder from which the person suffers. The specifics of the applying the measures envisaged by Art. 508 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (hereinafter referred to as the CPC) allowed to question the legitimacy of the legislative approach as to their allocation to the institution of precautionary measures in criminal proceedings. In particular, it was concluded that in contrast to the general purpose of application of precautionary measures stipulated by Art. 177 of the CPC (concerning the suspect, the accused, the condemned), for the purpose of applying precautionary measures envisaged by Art. 508 of the CPC (concerning a person in respect of whom the application of compulsory psychiatric care is stipulated) are: 1) prevention of risks of their possible illegal behaviour; 2) provision of qualified psychiatric care to them; 3) ensuring the person’s safety and the safety of others. In this regard, it should be noted that the position of the domestic legislator on the possibility of applying precautionary measures to persons suffering from mental disorders is subject to reasonable criticism of the legal community. The main argument in this debatable issue is that these persons cannot be subjects to which precautionary measures are applied, as the latter, according to the general rules, can be applied to clearly defined subjects of criminal proceedings - suspects, accused, and convicts.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
5.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания : PMID: 35029559/T99
Автор(ы) : Tyshchenko, Olga I. , Titko, Ivan A.
Заглавие : Presumption of mental health vs forensic psychiatric examination report: medical and legal aspect
Место публикации : Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2021. - Vol. 74, Iss. 11, cz. 2. - P.2934-2939
УДК : 343.95
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): assessment of expert opinion / report--court--expert opinion--expert report--forensic psychiatric examination--presumption of mental health--оцінка експертного висновку / звіт--суд--експертний висновок--експертний звіт--судово-психіатрична експертиза--презумпція психічного здоров'я--оценка экспертного заключения/отчета--мнение эксперта--экспертный отчет--судебно-психиатрическая экспертиза--презумпция психического здоровья
Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: The aim: The aim of this work is a legal analysis of the mental health presumption and its application by judges in assessing the report of the FPE; formulation of scientifically substantiated proposals for determining the criteria for the judge's assessment of the FPE report in refuting the presumption of mental health context. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The basis for the article was the results of scientific research published by representatives of different states regarding the criteria for assessing the expert's opinion as a procedural source of evidence; legislation (in the field of psychiatric care and criminal justice) of a number of European and Asian states and its implementation xperience; results of the survey of 88 judges conducted by the authors (judges of local courts of Ukraine, the survey was conducted in 2020) on key issues of ensuring the participation of a person suffering from a mental disorder in a court hearing. In this research, a complex of general and special scientific methods of cognition was used (comparative legal method, systemic-structural method, generalization method, method of analysis and synthesis, method of sociological research, method of expert assessments, etc.). RESULTS: Results: According to the results of the research: a) it is stated that the presumption of a person's mental health is a common European standard, regardless of the normative consolidation at the level of domestic legislation; b) it is proved that the effectiveness of the judge's use of the presumption of mental health in criminal proceedings directly correlates with his or her competent assessment of the FPE report and the providing appropriate argumentation in a court hearing; c) the factors that allow the judge to correctly assess the report of the FPE and put it in the basis of decision-making (that is, to refute the presumption of mental health of a person), or, on the contrary, to deny it (stating that the presumption of mental health has not been abolished). CONCLUSION: Conclusions: As a principle of modern psychiatry, the presumption of mental health is directly correlated with the FPE report, based on which it can be refuted. This determines the special importance of a competent assessment of this procedural source of evidence, the need for the judge to take into account several factors and to provide appropriate argumentation in the court hearing.
Найти похожие
6.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания :
Автор(ы) : Tyshchenko, Olga I., Titko, Ivan A.
Заглавие : Placement of a person in a medical institution in order to conduct a psychiatric examination: international standards and national realities
Место публикации : Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2020. - Vol. 74, Issue:9, cz. 2. - P.2020-2025
УДК : 340.63
ББК : Х897 + Х629.7
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): echr (european court of human rights) practice--практика европейского суда по правам человека--практика європейського суду з прав людини--diagnosis of mental disorders--диагностика психических нарушений--діагностика психічних порушень--outpatient psychiatric examination--амбулаторное психиатрическое обследование--амбулаторне психіатричне обстеження--expert opinion--мнение эксперта--думка експерта--medical certificate--медицинский сертификат--медичний сертифікат--right to liberty--право на свободу--forensic psychiatric--судебно-психиатрический осмотр--судово-психіатричний огляд
Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: The aim: The aim of this work is to identify the compliance level of modern practice of placement of a person in a medical institution in order to conduct the FPE to international standards and legal positions of the ECHR in terms of ensuring the right to liberty and security of person; formulation of scientifically substantiated proposals on the synchronization directions of national practices with the specified international standards. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: During the preparation of the article the following was processed: scientific research on ensuring the rights of persons suffering from mental disorders in criminal proceedings; provisions of international agreements on the provision of psychiatric care; legal positions of the ECHR on the observance of persons' rights suffering from mental disorders (15 judgments on this topic); criminal procedural legislation of individual states; results of generalization of national law enforcement practice; the results of a survey conducted by the authors of 18 psychiatrists who practice in the field of forensic psychiatric examinations (psychiatrists working in state psychiatric clinics in Odesa, Poltava, Kharkiv were interviewed). In the process of research a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition was used (comparative-legal method, system-structural method, generalization method, method of analysis and synthesis, method of sociological research, method of expert assessments, etc.). RESULTS: Results: According to the research results: a) legal positions of the ECHR on the observance of the rights of persons suffering from mental disorders are identified and generalized; b) the compliance level of modern practice of placing a person in a medical institution in order to conduct the FPE with international standards and legal positions of the ECHR in terms of ensuring the right to liberty and security of person ( 1 of Article 5 of the Convention); c) the degree of extrapolation of these positions to the activities of psychiatrists is analyzed; d) the optimal ways of solving the existing problems in the aspect of ensuring the rights of a person when placing them in a medical institution for an inpatient FPE are proposed. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The current national practice of placing a person in a medical institution for an inpatient FPE does not fully comply with the legal positions of the ECHR in terms of ensuring the right to liberty and security of person (in particular, there are deviations from the positions of the ECHR on: determining the documentary basis for the appointment of an inpatient FPE; interaction of police and medical workers in the field of psychiatry during the detention of a person with a mental disorder). Keywords
Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
7.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания : 347.77/.78/U88
Автор(ы) : Us M.V., Titko I. A.
Заглавие : Protection of economic competition and intellectual property: search for an optimal regulatory model
Место публикации : Science and innovation. - 2019. - Vol.: 15, Issue: 2. - P.41-51
УДК : 347.77/.78 + 346
ББК : Х623.3 + Х623.4 + Х623.911
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): интеллектуальная собственность--инновации--недобросовестная конкуренция--антимонопольное регулирование--ограничение экономической конкуренции--результаты интеллектуального труда
Аннотация: Introduction. Failure to comply with the rules of competition is often associated with breach of intellectual property rights of other parties or misuse of these rights by authorized entities themselves. Problem Statement. The foregoing implies a whole set of problems related to ensuring the protection of economic competition and intellectual property rights, as well as to preventing the abuse of these rights, which often leads to restrictions of competition. Purpose. To study regulations and legislative acts concerning the protection of economic competition and intellectual property both at the national and international levels, the interaction and coherence of competition law and regulations in the field of rights to intellectual labor results. Materials and Methods. The research is based on the legislation of Ukraine and international legal acts, as well as the practice of the national courts of Ukraine, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and the administrative practice of the European Commission. The methodological framework of the research comprises the methods for historical, dialectical, systematic, and logical research, the formal legal method, and the method of comparative jurisprudence. Results. The relationship between the competition law and the intellectual property law has been established, the consequences of the imbalance between them (creation of monopolies, fragmentation of the internal market, market stagnation) have been identified, ways to avoid these negative consequences have been suggested. Conclusions. The regulations and laws in the field of protection of economic competition and the exercise of intellectual property rights should be based on a model according to which the competitive behavior implies the observance of intellectual property rights of other parties, with the behavior of right owners leading to neither any restriction of competition nor any breach of consumer rights.
Текст - 0 байт
Текст
Найти похожие
8.

Вид документа : Статья из журнала
Шифр издания : Х629.34/V28
Автор(ы) : Vapniarchuk V. V., Kaplina, Oksana V., Titko I. A., Maryniv, Volodimir, Lazukova O. V.
Заглавие : The burden of criminal procedural proof
Место публикации : Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. - 2019. - Vol. 10, Iss. 1. - p.386-394
ББК : Х629.34
Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): legal position--proof of facts--responsibility--the burden of proof--юридическое положение--доказывание фактов--обязанность--бремя доказывания--юридичне положення--доказування фактів--тагяр доказування
Аннотация: The urgency of the article stated in the article is due to the need to revise traditional scientific views on certain peculiarities of criminal procedural evidence in connection with the expansion of the adversarial nature of domestic criminal proceedings. The purpose of the paper is to determine the essence of the category ‘burden of proof’ and justify the necessity of introducing it into scientific and law enforcement circulation. The main approach to the study of this problem was to carry out a critical analysis of the norms of the current criminal procedural legislation that regulates the requirements regarding the burden of proof and the views expressed on their proper understanding and application. The publication expresses the view that the distinction between such legal categories as ‘burden of proof’ and ‘burden of proof’ is proposed, the definition of the concept of ‘burden of proof’ is proposed and the rules for burden sharing between parties of criminal proceedings are analyzed. The material of the article represents both theoretical and practical value. They can be used for further research into the essence of the concept of ‘burden of proof’, as well as for proper understanding and enforcement of criminal procedural law enforcement activities.
Анотація - 0 байт
Анотація,
Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Найти похожие
 

Умовні позначення місця знаходження

3_пов.(ЗПІ) – зала правової інформації, НБК

4_пов.(НАб) – абонемент наукової літератури, НБК

4_пов.(ДБФ) – довідково-бібліографічний фонд, НБК

5_пов.(З/П) – зала періодичних видань, НБК

6_пов.(АХЛ) – абонемент художньої літератури, НБК

6_пов.(ЗІЛ) – зала літератури іноземними мовами, НБК

7_пов.(Хр) – книгосховище, НБК

8_пов.(РК) – книгосховище рідкісних видань та дисертацій, НБК

НБВ – інформаційно-бібліографічний відділ, НБК, 7 поверх

Ст.Аб. – студентський абонемент, НБК, 5 поверх

Філ №1 – філія № 1 (вул. Динамівська, 4)

Філ №2 – філія № 2 (вул. Пушкінська, 106)

Полт. фак. – Полтавський юридичний інститут, м. Полтава