Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого ⚖ Головна ⓘ Довiдка
Авторизацiя
Прiзвище (укр.)
N Читацького квитка
 

Базы данных


Е-картотека "Публікації вчених НЮУ ім. Ярослава Мудрого в Scopus" - результати пошуку

Вид пошуку

  • Власна база даних
  • Більше 728 000 документів: книги, статті, збірники наукових праць, рідкісні видання, дисертації, автореферати
  • Створюється з 1999 року
  • Легкий, зручний, багатоаспектний інформаційний пошук
  • Можливість цілодобово працювати з інформаційним контентом
  • Електронне замовлення книг дистанційно
Область поиска
Формат представлення знайдених документів :
полныйинформационныйкраткий
Отсортировать найденные документы по:
авторузаглавиюгоду изданиятипу документа
Пошуковий запит: 

(<.>A=ТИЩЕНКО, ОЛЬГА ІГОРІВНА$<.>)

Загальна кількість знайденихдокументів : 4
Показані документи с 1 по 4
1.
Tatsiy, V. Y..
    Mental health of a person as a criterion of personal participation in the trial during criminal proceedings [Текст] / V. Y. Tatsiy, O. I. Tyshchenko, I. A. Titko // Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2020. - Vol. 73, Iss.12, cz. 2. - P. 2737-2742
   Перевод заглавия: Психическое здоровье человека как критерий персональной участия в суде во время уголовного производства
РУБ PubMed ID33611275

Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to identify and analyze the key positions of the ECHR in the context of respect for the right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter - the Convention)) of a person suffering from mental disorders in criminal proceedings concerning the application of compulsory medical measures (hereinafter referred to as CMM); formulation of scientifically substantiated proposals for determining the restriction legality criteria of the right of a person suffering from a mental disorder to personal participation in the trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: During the preparation of the article, the following was processed: scientific research on ensuring the rights of persons suffering from mental disorders in criminal proceedings; provisions of international agreements on the provision of psychiatric care; the legal position of the ECHR on the observance of the right to a fair trial of persons suffering from mental disorders (6 decisions were analyzed in which the ECHR addressed these issues in the context of the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention); criminal procedural legislation of individual states; the results of a survey conducted by the authors of 88 judges (judges of local courts of Ukraine) on key issues of ensuring the participation of a person suffering from a mental disorder in a court hearing. In the process of research a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition was used (comparative-legal method, systemic-structural method, generalization method, method of analysis and synthesis, method of sociological research, method of expert assessments, etc.). RESULTS: Results: According to the results of the research: a) the legal positions of the ECHR to ensure the right of a person suffering from a mental disorder to a fair trial are identified and generalized (Article 6 of the Convention); b) criteria for the legality of restricting the right of a person suffering from a mental disorder to personal participation in the trial are proposed. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: An analysis of the ECHR's key positions led to the conclusion that there was a violation of a person's right to a fair trial in national case law (Article 6 of theConvention), due in part to the lack of clear criteria for legally restricting a person's right to a trial.

Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки


Найти похожие

2.
Tyshchenko, O. I..
    European standards of respect for human rights in the application of compulsory medical measures in criminal proceedings [Текст] / O. I. Tyshchenko, O. A. Leiba, I. A. Titko // Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2019. - Vol. 72, Iss. 12. - p. 2445-2450
   Перевод заглавия: Европейские стандарты уважения прав человека при применении принудительных мер медицинского характера в уголовном процессе
ББК Х629.382
РУБ PubMed: 32124767

Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: Introduction: The article is devoted to the research of topical issues of ensuring the rights of persons suffering from mental disorders and who are subject to criminal proceedings on the application of compulsory medical measures (hereinafter - CMM). The research was conducted in the context of international standards and interpretative practice of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the ECHR or the Court). The aim: The aim of this study is to analyze international acts concerning the protection of the rights of mentally ill persons when applying compulsory medical measures; to highlight and analyze the ECHR's key positions in the context of respect for the right to liberty and security of person (Article 5 1 (e) of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the Convention)) and the right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the Convention) in criminal proceedings concerning the use of CMM; to analyse the law enforcement practice and activities of psychiatrist experts on compliance with European standards for the protection of the rights of persons with mental disorders who are subject to criminal proceedings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: rescent scientific researches; provisions of international legal acts in the field of psychiatric care; the legal standpoint of the ECHR in respecting the rights of persons with mental disorders (15 decisions were analyzed in which the ECHR addressed these issues in the context of the requirements of Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention); criminal procedural legislation of foreign states (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russian Federation, Estonia, Uzbekistan, Germany); the results of the survey of 20 psychiatrists and experts conducted by the authors were used in this article To achieve this aim of research process a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition, including comparative and legal method, system and structural method, method of generalization, method of analysis and synthesis, method of sociological research, method of expert evaluation, etc. bein used. RESULTS: Results: summarized and generalized ECHR's standpoints concerning: a) minimum conditions without which a person cannot be considered as "mentally ill" and imprisoned; b) the aspects taken into account by the ECHR within each minimum condition in the context of ensuring the right to liberty and security of person (Article 5 1 (e) of the Convention); c) the peculiarities of the personal participation of an individual with a mental disorder in the judicial review of the application of CMM in terms of observing its right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the Convention). The degree of extrapolation of these standpoints to the activity of psychiatrists was identified and analyzed. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: the current practice of applying CMM in criminal proceedings does not fully comply with the international standards and legal positions of the ECHR in terms of providing a person with a mental disorder the right to liberty and security of person and the right to a fair trial (in particular, the minimum conditions without which a person cannot be considered as "mentally ill" and be imprisoned are not always met).

Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки


Найти похожие

3.
Tyshchenko, O. I..
    Features of application of precautionary measures for persons suffering from mental disorders: National dimension [Текст] = Особливості застосування запобіжних заходів щодо осіб, які страждають на психічні розлади: національний вимір / O. I. Tyshchenko, I. A. Titko // Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine. - 2020. - Vol. 27, Iss. 1. - P. 147-161
УДК
РУБ DOI: 10.37635/jnalsu.27(1).2020.147-161

Аннотация: The paper investigates topical issues of application of precautionary measures against persons subject to criminal proceedings for the application of compulsory psychiatric care in the context of international standards and interpretative practice of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The purpose of this paper is to identify and analyse the specific features of applying precautionary measures to a person suffering from a mental disorder based on the materials of generalization of domestic law enforcement practice in criminal proceedings regarding the application of compulsory psychiatric care. Research methods are selected with consideration of the purpose, objectives, and subject of research. General scientific and special methods of scientific cognition (dialectical, statistical, comparative law, analysis, synthesis, generalization) were used in the work. The integrated use of these methods has contributed to an objective and comprehensive scientific study. Based on the analysis of the current legislation and judicial practice, the specific features of application of preventive measures in criminal proceedings regarding compulsory psychiatric care are singled out, namely: a) they are applied to a person suffering from a mental disorder; b) are selected only in criminal proceedings concerning the application of compulsory psychiatric care; c) have a specific purpose conditioned by the presence of a mental disorder from which the person suffers. The specifics of the applying the measures envisaged by Art. 508 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (hereinafter referred to as the CPC) allowed to question the legitimacy of the legislative approach as to their allocation to the institution of precautionary measures in criminal proceedings. In particular, it was concluded that in contrast to the general purpose of application of precautionary measures stipulated by Art. 177 of the CPC (concerning the suspect, the accused, the condemned), for the purpose of applying precautionary measures envisaged by Art. 508 of the CPC (concerning a person in respect of whom the application of compulsory psychiatric care is stipulated) are: 1) prevention of risks of their possible illegal behaviour; 2) provision of qualified psychiatric care to them; 3) ensuring the person’s safety and the safety of others. In this regard, it should be noted that the position of the domestic legislator on the possibility of applying precautionary measures to persons suffering from mental disorders is subject to reasonable criticism of the legal community. The main argument in this debatable issue is that these persons cannot be subjects to which precautionary measures are applied, as the latter, according to the general rules, can be applied to clearly defined subjects of criminal proceedings - suspects, accused, and convicts.

Текст - 0 байт
Текст, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки


Найти похожие

4.
Tyshchenko, O. I..
    Presumption of mental health vs forensic psychiatric examination report: medical and legal aspect [Text] / O. I. Tyshchenko, I. A. Titko // Wiadomosci lekarskie. - 2021. - Vol. 74, Iss. 11, cz. 2. - P. 2934-2939
   Перевод заглавия: Презумпція психічного здоров'я проти висновку судово-психіатричної експертизи: медико-правовий аспект
УДК
РУБ PMID: 35029559 + DOI: 10.36740/WLek202111213

Аннотация: OBJECTIVE: The aim: The aim of this work is a legal analysis of the mental health presumption and its application by judges in assessing the report of the FPE; formulation of scientifically substantiated proposals for determining the criteria for the judge's assessment of the FPE report in refuting the presumption of mental health context. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The basis for the article was the results of scientific research published by representatives of different states regarding the criteria for assessing the expert's opinion as a procedural source of evidence; legislation (in the field of psychiatric care and criminal justice) of a number of European and Asian states and its implementation xperience; results of the survey of 88 judges conducted by the authors (judges of local courts of Ukraine, the survey was conducted in 2020) on key issues of ensuring the participation of a person suffering from a mental disorder in a court hearing. In this research, a complex of general and special scientific methods of cognition was used (comparative legal method, systemic-structural method, generalization method, method of analysis and synthesis, method of sociological research, method of expert assessments, etc.). RESULTS: Results: According to the results of the research: a) it is stated that the presumption of a person's mental health is a common European standard, regardless of the normative consolidation at the level of domestic legislation; b) it is proved that the effectiveness of the judge's use of the presumption of mental health in criminal proceedings directly correlates with his or her competent assessment of the FPE report and the providing appropriate argumentation in a court hearing; c) the factors that allow the judge to correctly assess the report of the FPE and put it in the basis of decision-making (that is, to refute the presumption of mental health of a person), or, on the contrary, to deny it (stating that the presumption of mental health has not been abolished). CONCLUSION: Conclusions: As a principle of modern psychiatry, the presumption of mental health is directly correlated with the FPE report, based on which it can be refuted. This determines the special importance of a competent assessment of this procedural source of evidence, the need for the judge to take into account several factors and to provide appropriate argumentation in the court hearing.


Найти похожие

 

Умовні позначення місця знаходження

3_пов.(ЗПІ) – зала правової інформації, НБК

4_пов.(НАб) – абонемент наукової літератури, НБК

4_пов.(ДБФ) – довідково-бібліографічний фонд, НБК

5_пов.(З/П) – зала періодичних видань, НБК

6_пов.(АХЛ) – абонемент художньої літератури, НБК

6_пов.(ЗІЛ) – зала літератури іноземними мовами, НБК

7_пов.(Хр) – книгосховище, НБК

8_пов.(РК) – книгосховище рідкісних видань та дисертацій, НБК

НБВ – інформаційно-бібліографічний відділ, НБК, 7 поверх

Ст.Аб. – студентський абонемент, НБК, 5 поверх

Філ №1 – філія № 1 (вул. Динамівська, 4)

Філ №2 – філія № 2 (вул. Пушкінська, 106)

Полт. фак. – Полтавський юридичний інститут, м. Полтава