(<.>U=796<.>)

Kolomiitseva, O. .
    Efficiency of Physical Education of University Students Based on the Motivation Choice of the CrossFit Program [Текст] / O. Kolomiitseva, A. Prikhodko, S. Fishev, I. Prykhodko, R. Anatskyi, A. Turchynov, S. Hunbina, O. Garkavyi // Physical activity review. - 2020. - Vol. 8, Issue: 1. - P. 26-38
   Перевод заглавия: Эффективность физического воспитания студентов вузов на основе мотивационного выбора программы CrossFit

УДК

796

ББК Ч51
РУБ DOI: 10.16926/par.2020.08.04

Аннотация: Introduction: The article presents the results of the study of changes in the level of physical fitness of students of a humanitarian university and military academy cadets based on the choice of the CrossFit program in the process of physical education. Materials and Methods: The young men (n=92), aged 17-18 years, (two experimental and two control groups) took part in the study of the level of physical fitness. The study was conducted for 12 weeks. Experimental groups were engaged in the CrossFit program. The motivation for choosing the CrossFit program by the participants in the experiment (n=48) was determined using a specially designed questionnaire 'The Motives for Participating in Exercises Measure' on the example CrossFit. Results: For cadets, the results of sit-up and push-up have a significant increase (p<0.05). A more significant increase is observed in squats with kettlebell (7kg) and burpee (p<0.01, p<0.001). The results of students in sit-up, push-up, burpee have a significant increase (p<0.05). For participants in the experiment, the most common motives for choosing the CrossFit program for physical education classes were the following: 'to adjust the body shape, make me more courageous and athletic, increase muscle'; 'to increase my activity and vitality'; 'to improve my endurance, performance, reduce fatigue during physical loads'. For students, motives for health promotion are of higher priority than for cadets. Conclusions: The result of the motivated use of the CrossFit program for 12 weeks was a significant improvement in the physical condition of the students and cadets.

Текст - 0 байт
, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки

Prikhodko, A.
    Sokolstvo in Ukrainian regions of the Russian empire: From origin to downfall [Текст] / A. Prikhodko, O. Kolomiitseva, V. Prykhodko // Science of Gymnastics Journal. - 2020. - Vol. 12, Issue 3. - P. 407-418
   Перевод заглавия: Сокольство в украинских регионах Российской империи: от зарождения к гибели

УДК

796

ББК Ч51 + Ч517 + Ч515

Аннотация: The purpose of this study is to advance a better insight into the history of Sokolstvo (Sokol movement) in the Ukraine within the territorial borders of the Russian Empire, and the variety of reasons for its origin and downfall. Slavic origin of Sokolstvo, the activity of supporters of Sokol gymnastics (SG) in the popularization of Sokol idea and, a gradual rapprochement of supporters of the two opposing areas of reforming Russia for further development began (“Slavophiles” and “Westerners”) contributed to the emergence and rapid development of the Sokol movement in the Ukrainian regions of Russia. In the 90s of the 19th century, SG began to be cultivated in the Sokol units of gymnastic societies, since 1907 independent institutions began to open. By World War I, Sokol gymnastic societies (SGS) in Ukraine were the largest group. SGS constantly trained instructors, but the majority of SG teachers were foreigners, Czech by nationality. SG was officially introduced into the military training of the army and the curricula of secondary schools and cadet corps. Sokol events were a significant part of the public life of many Ukrainian cities. Representatives of Ukrainian regional societies became members of the Board of the Union of the Russian Sokol, founded in 1910. The crisis of the Sokolstvo began in the years of the World War I due to the growth of xenophobic attitudes. During the years of Soviet power, the Sokol were accused of a bourgeois orientation, recognized as the “hotbed of counter-revolution” and banned in 1923.

Текст - 0 байт
, Работа с электронной копией документа возможна только в читальном зале библиотеки