Вид документа : Статья из журнала Шифр издания : Автор(ы) : Urazova, Ganna, Yanyshen, Victor, Baranova, Liudmyla Заглавие : Who is the Owner? Newly Discovered Circumstances and the Principle of Legal Certainty in a Single Case Study Место публикации : Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. - 2022. - Vol. 5 [не зазначено у Web of Science], Iss. 1 (13). - P.193-202 УДК : 347.91/.95 Ключевые слова (''Своб.индексиров.''): newly discovered circumstance--вновь открывшееся обстоятельство--нововиявлена обставина--civil proceedings--цивільне судочинство--гражданское судопроизводство--principle of legal certainty--принцип правовой определенности--принцип правової визначеності--right to a fair trial--право на справедливий суд--право на справедливое судебное разбирательство--ukrainian law--украинское право--українське право Аннотация: Background: The protection of property rights is one of the cornerstones of legal order. If we were uncertain whether ownership would be protected from claims or whether contract obligations would be executed properly, we could not regulate relations effectively. Courts play a crucial role in this mechanism of protecting the owner's rights, giving parties possibilities for defence. This note is related to one of the last judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the focus of which is on newly discovered circumstances and the principle of legal certainty. The facts of this case arose from a property sale contract with a condition, the validity of which led to the consideration of multiple cases by different Ukrainian courts. Methods: In light of the above, an analysis of this ECtHR judgment, as well as the final and interim decisions of Ukrainian courts, with regard to Ukrainian legislation and case law was prepared. The main challenge was the absence of the oldest decisions of national courts in the state register of court decisions, which contains only decisions from 2011. Even so, the facts of this case were described in detail in the latest courts decisions. Results and Conclusions: The following analysis provides an argument against reopening procedure without proper grounds, which lead to the violation of the right to a fair trial in civil procedure in Ukraine. Держатели документа: Web of Science Core Collection Scopus Доп.точки доступа: Yanyshen, Victor; Янишен, Віктор Петрович; Baranova, Liudmyla; Баранова, Людмила Миколаївна; Уразова, Ганна Олександрівна